Judith E. Scott‐Clayton

739 total citations
19 papers, 438 citations indexed

About

Judith E. Scott‐Clayton is a scholar working on Education, Economics and Econometrics and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Judith E. Scott‐Clayton has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 438 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Education, 7 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 4 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Judith E. Scott‐Clayton's work include Higher Education Research Studies (12 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (3 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers). Judith E. Scott‐Clayton is often cited by papers focused on Higher Education Research Studies (12 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (3 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers). Judith E. Scott‐Clayton collaborates with scholars based in United States. Judith E. Scott‐Clayton's co-authors include Susan Dynarski, Sandy Baum, Yang Zhou, Katherine L. Hughes and Lauren Schudde and has published in prestigious journals such as National Tax Journal, Tax Policy and the Economy and Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University).

In The Last Decade

Judith E. Scott‐Clayton

19 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Judith E. Scott‐Clayton United States 8 365 111 82 52 50 19 438
Angela Boatman United States 10 384 1.1× 76 0.7× 51 0.6× 63 1.2× 44 0.9× 22 477
Jeffrey T. Denning United States 10 294 0.8× 140 1.3× 84 1.0× 47 0.9× 52 1.0× 30 397
Steven W. Hemelt United States 11 354 1.0× 93 0.8× 26 0.3× 42 0.8× 75 1.5× 39 452
Johnny B. Starkey United States 9 410 1.1× 68 0.6× 39 0.5× 67 1.3× 30 0.6× 9 439
Jessica Howell United States 9 352 1.0× 84 0.8× 19 0.2× 39 0.8× 85 1.7× 32 440
Sue Hatt United Kingdom 13 261 0.7× 29 0.3× 31 0.4× 23 0.4× 89 1.8× 26 348
Lauren Schudde United States 13 386 1.1× 39 0.4× 17 0.2× 58 1.1× 90 1.8× 42 483
Jamin D. Speer United States 9 142 0.4× 237 2.1× 30 0.4× 62 1.2× 109 2.2× 22 417
Lars J. Kirkebøen Norway 6 204 0.6× 201 1.8× 44 0.5× 80 1.5× 207 4.1× 16 511
Nick Hillman United States 6 159 0.4× 46 0.4× 52 0.6× 19 0.4× 21 0.4× 14 273

Countries citing papers authored by Judith E. Scott‐Clayton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Judith E. Scott‐Clayton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith E. Scott‐Clayton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith E. Scott‐Clayton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Judith E. Scott‐Clayton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith E. Scott‐Clayton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith E. Scott‐Clayton. The network helps show where Judith E. Scott‐Clayton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Judith E. Scott‐Clayton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Judith E. Scott‐Clayton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Judith E. Scott‐Clayton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Judith E. Scott‐Clayton. Judith E. Scott‐Clayton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Scott‐Clayton, Judith E.. (2018). The Looming Student Loan Crisis Is Worse Than We Thought. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 23 indexed citations
2.
Scott‐Clayton, Judith E.. (2018). What Accounts for Gaps in Student Loan Default, and What Happens After. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 9 indexed citations
3.
Scott‐Clayton, Judith E. & Yang Zhou. (2017). Does the Federal Work-Study Program Really Work—and for Whom?. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 3 indexed citations
4.
Scott‐Clayton, Judith E. & Lauren Schudde. (2017). Performance Requirements in Need-Based Aid: What Roles Do They Serve, and Do They Work?. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 1 indexed citations
5.
Scott‐Clayton, Judith E.. (2017). Federal Work-Study: Past Its Prime, or Ripe for Renewal?. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 2 indexed citations
6.
Scott‐Clayton, Judith E. & Lauren Schudde. (2016). Performance Standards in Need-Based Student Aid. National Bureau of Economic Research. 1 indexed citations
7.
Scott‐Clayton, Judith E.. (2016). Early Labor Market and Debt Outcomes for Bachelor’s Degree Recipients: Heterogeneity by Institution Type and Major, and Trends Over Time. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 4 indexed citations
8.
Dynarski, Susan & Judith E. Scott‐Clayton. (2016). Tax Benefits for College Attendance. National Bureau of Economic Research. 2 indexed citations
9.
Scott‐Clayton, Judith E., et al.. (2015). The Federal Work-Study Program: Impacts on Academic Outcomes and Employment. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 1 indexed citations
10.
Baum, Sandy & Judith E. Scott‐Clayton. (2013). Redesigning the Pell Grant Program for the Twenty-First Century. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 11 indexed citations
11.
Scott‐Clayton, Judith E.. (2012). What Explains Trends in the Labor Supply Among U.S. Undergraduates, 1970-2009?. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 7 indexed citations
12.
Scott‐Clayton, Judith E.. (2012). Do High-Stakes Placement Exams Predict College Success?. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 71 indexed citations
13.
Scott‐Clayton, Judith E.. (2011). The Shapeless River: Does a Lack of Structure Inhibit Students' Progress at Community Colleges?. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 66 indexed citations
14.
Scott‐Clayton, Judith E., et al.. (2011). Institutional Variation in Credential Completion: Evidence from Washington State Community and Technical Colleges. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 2 indexed citations
15.
Scott‐Clayton, Judith E.. (2011). The Shapeless River: Does a Lack of Structure Inhibit Students' Progress at Community Colleges? (Assessment of Evidence Series). Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 1 indexed citations
16.
Hughes, Katherine L. & Judith E. Scott‐Clayton. (2011). Assessing Developmental Assessment in Community Colleges (Assessment of Evidence Series). Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 1 indexed citations
17.
Dynarski, Susan & Judith E. Scott‐Clayton. (2008). Complexity and Targeting in Federal Student Aid: A Quantitative Analysis. NBER Working Paper No. 13801.. National Bureau of Economic Research. 9 indexed citations
18.
Dynarski, Susan & Judith E. Scott‐Clayton. (2008). 4Complexity and Targeting in Federal Student Aid: A Quantitative Analysis. Tax Policy and the Economy. 22(1). 109–150. 47 indexed citations
19.
Dynarski, Susan & Judith E. Scott‐Clayton. (2006). The Cost of Complexity in Federal Student Aid: Lessons from Optimal Tax Theory and Behavioral Economics. National Tax Journal. 59(2). 319–356. 177 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026