Nathan C. Phillips

978 total citations · 1 hit paper
22 papers, 543 citations indexed

About

Nathan C. Phillips is a scholar working on Education, Literature and Literary Theory and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathan C. Phillips has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 543 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Education, 10 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 4 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Nathan C. Phillips's work include Literacy, Media, and Education (9 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (4 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (3 papers). Nathan C. Phillips is often cited by papers focused on Literacy, Media, and Education (9 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (4 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (3 papers). Nathan C. Phillips collaborates with scholars based in United States. Nathan C. Phillips's co-authors include Kevin M. Leander, A. H. Smith, Amy Stornaiuolo, Anderson Norton, Catherine Ulrich, Rebecca Woodard, Jesse L. M. Wilkins, María Varelas, Katie Taylor and Reed Stevens and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Science Education and British Journal of Educational Technology.

In The Last Decade

Nathan C. Phillips

20 papers receiving 490 citations

Hit Papers

The Changing Social Spaces of Learning: Mapping New Mobil... 2010 2026 2015 2020 2010 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nathan C. Phillips United States 8 300 191 169 77 51 22 543
Lindsay Ellis United States 3 533 1.8× 259 1.4× 206 1.2× 170 2.2× 132 2.6× 5 808
Mark Dressman United States 13 329 1.1× 256 1.3× 108 0.6× 193 2.5× 93 1.8× 45 631
Kathryn Ciechanowski United States 7 596 2.0× 265 1.4× 219 1.3× 190 2.5× 145 2.8× 10 893
Victoria Carrington Australia 14 332 1.1× 201 1.1× 160 0.9× 65 0.8× 38 0.7× 37 577
Colleen M. Fairbanks United States 11 537 1.8× 137 0.7× 131 0.8× 155 2.0× 52 1.0× 24 670
Mary B. McVee United States 11 254 0.8× 157 0.8× 131 0.8× 111 1.4× 37 0.7× 49 530
Fritjof Sahlström Finland 18 416 1.4× 198 1.0× 152 0.9× 112 1.5× 92 1.8× 50 834
Lesley A. Rex United States 14 488 1.6× 150 0.8× 154 0.9× 141 1.8× 105 2.1× 22 663
Diane Mavers United Kingdom 12 378 1.3× 205 1.1× 113 0.7× 104 1.4× 45 0.9× 22 675
Ruth Hubbard Australia 9 461 1.5× 105 0.5× 110 0.7× 110 1.4× 17 0.3× 33 606

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan C. Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan C. Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan C. Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan C. Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan C. Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan C. Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan C. Phillips. The network helps show where Nathan C. Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan C. Phillips

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan C. Phillips. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan C. Phillips based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan C. Phillips. Nathan C. Phillips is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Varelas, María, et al.. (2024). Latinx students embodying justice‐centered science: Agency through imagining via the performing arts. Science Education. 108(3). 851–889. 4 indexed citations
2.
Woodard, Rebecca, et al.. (2024). ‘Be Creative and Have Fun’: elementary‐aged children's digital and embodied composing in science. Literacy. 58(2). 167–177. 1 indexed citations
3.
Varelas, María, et al.. (2024). Embodied, dramatizing performances in science class: multimodal spaces and places of knowledge and identity construction. Research in Science & Technological Education. 42(1). 157–179. 3 indexed citations
4.
Woodard, Rebecca, et al.. (2023). “I. Am. a. Star.”: exploring moments of muchness in children’s digital compositional play and embodied science learning. English Teaching Practice & Critique. 22(2). 163–176. 3 indexed citations
5.
Phillips, Nathan C., et al.. (2021). Leveling Up: Connected Mentor Learning in a Digital Media Production After-School Space. Journal of Youth Development. 16(1). 29–54. 2 indexed citations
6.
Phillips, Nathan C., et al.. (2019). Sustaining affective resonance: Co‐constructing care in a school‐based digital design studio. British Journal of Educational Technology. 50(4). 1532–1543. 8 indexed citations
7.
Woodard, Rebecca, et al.. (2018). Connected Teaching and Learning in K-16+ Contexts: An Annotated Bibliography. 18(2). 289–312. 1 indexed citations
8.
Radinsky, Josh, Shirin Vossoughi, Ananda Marin, et al.. (2018). Community-based design partnerships: Examples from a new generation of chat/dbr. 2. 1312–1319. 3 indexed citations
9.
Woodard, Rebecca, et al.. (2018). Leading the Call: Cultivating Urban Literacies onChicago’s South Side through aPedagogy of Spatial Justice. Voices from the Middle. 25(3). 26–29. 2 indexed citations
10.
Smith, A. H., Amy Stornaiuolo, & Nathan C. Phillips. (2017). Multiplicities in Motion: A Turn to Transliteracies. Theory Into Practice. 57(1). 20–28. 17 indexed citations
11.
Phillips, Nathan C., et al.. (2016). Cultivating Disciplinary Futures in a School‐Based Digital Atelier. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 60(4). 461–465. 2 indexed citations
12.
Stornaiuolo, Amy, A. H. Smith, & Nathan C. Phillips. (2016). Developing a Transliteracies Framework for a Connected World. Journal of Literacy Research. 49(1). 68–91. 115 indexed citations
13.
Norton, Anderson, et al.. (2015). A Written Instrument for Assessing Students’ Units Coordination Structures. PDXScholar (Portland State University). 10(2). 111–136. 13 indexed citations
14.
Norton, Anderson, et al.. (2015). A Written Instrument for Assessing Students’ Units Coordination Structures. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. 10(2). 111–136. 14 indexed citations
15.
Norton, Anderson, et al.. (2015). Students’ units coordination activity: A cross-sectional analysis. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 39. 51–66. 22 indexed citations
16.
Phillips, Nathan C., et al.. (2011). From I-Search to iSearch 2.0. 10(4). 139–148. 1 indexed citations
17.
Hall, Rogers, et al.. (2010). Scaling practices of spatial analysis and modeling. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 157–163. 3 indexed citations
18.
Leander, Kevin M., et al.. (2010). The Changing Social Spaces of Learning: Mapping New Mobilities. Review of Research in Education. 34(1). 329–394. 308 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Arzarello, Ferdinando, Michael C. Corballis, Jihun Hamm, et al.. (2009). Didactical consequences of semantically meaningful mathematical gestures. 2. 57–64. 1 indexed citations
20.
Phillips, Nathan C.. (2007). Beyond Fidelity: Teaching Film Adaptations in Secondary Schools. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026