A. H. Smith
Impact in
-
- Literacy, Media, and Education
Papers in
- Physiology 15
- Nutrition and Health in Aging 5
- Spaceflight effects on biology 5
- Diet and metabolism studies 4
-
- Literacy, Media, and Education 11
- Co-authors
- Craig Steinmaus (1 shared paper)Nathan C. Phillips (3 shared papers)Amy Stornaiuolo (2 shared papers)W. Crawford Clark (3 shared papers)A. W. Lawson (2 shared papers)G L Hill (3 shared papers)N S Williams (2 shared papers)Michael F. Dixon (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Poultry Science (6 papers)British journal of surgery (4 papers)Physics in Medicine and Biology (4 papers)Nuclear Medicine Communications (3 papers)Literacy (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
A. H. Smith
89 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
- Literature and Literary Theory 163
- General Psychology 11
- Linguistics and Language 39
- Ceramics and Composites 49
- Cognitive Neuroscience 158
Countries citing papers authored by A. H. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of A. H. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. H. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. H. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. H. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. H. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. H. Smith. The network helps show where A. H. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside A. H. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 145 | |
| 2 | 1986 | 131 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 115 | |
| 4 | 1956 | 58 | |
| 5 | 1978 | 55 | |
| 6 | 1954 | 52 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 51 | |
| 8 | 1955 | 40 | |
| 9 | 1979 | 39 | |
| 10 | 1975 | 34 | |
| 11 | 1975 | 31 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 29 | |
| 13 | 1976 | 26 | |
| 14 | 1956 | 26 | |
| 15 | 1957 | 24 | |
| 16 | 1968 | 21 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 21 | |
| 18 | 1965 | 19 | |
| 19 | 1975 | 19 | |
| 20 | 1982 | 18 |
About A. H. Smith
A. H. Smith is a scholar working on Physiology, Literature and Literary Theory, Animal Science and Zoology, Education and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 92 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literacy, Media, and Education (11 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (9 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (5 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (5 papers), Spaceflight effects on biology (5 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (163 citations), General Psychology (11 citations), Linguistics and Language (39 citations), Ceramics and Composites (49 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (158 citations). A. H. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Craig Steinmaus, Nathan C. Phillips, Amy Stornaiuolo, W. Crawford Clark, A. W. Lawson, G L Hill, N S Williams, Michael F. Dixon, D Johnston and P. Godwin. Their work appears in journals such as Poultry Science, British journal of surgery, Physics in Medicine and Biology, Nuclear Medicine Communications and Literacy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.