Natasha M. Speer
- Education top 1%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Statistics and Probability top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Modeling and Simulation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Julia AguirreJoseph F. WagnerJohn P. SmithHeather HowellKaren KingTeri J. MurphyGinger V. ShultzTessa C. Andrews
- Topics
- Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (14 papers)Statistics Education and Methodologies (7 papers)Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal for Research in Mathematics EducationCognition and InstructionEducational Studies in Mathematics
- Partner nations
- United StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Natasha M. Speer
17 papers receiving 636 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Education 684
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 190
- Statistics and Probability 153
- Sociology and Political Science 56
- Modeling and Simulation 49
Countries citing papers authored by Natasha M. Speer
This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha M. Speer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha M. Speer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha M. Speer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha M. Speer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha M. Speer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha M. Speer. The network helps show where Natasha M. Speer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha M. Speer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha M. Speer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha M. Speer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha M. Speer. Natasha M. Speer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 55 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 90 | |
| 11 | 96 | |
| 12 | 68 | |
| 13 | 53 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | Teaching Assistants Knowledge and Beliefs Related to Student Learning of Calculus | 2 |
| 16 | 131 | |
| 17 | Meeting the Changing Needs of Mathematics Graduate Student Teaching Assistants: The Evolution of Professional Development Activities for Instruction Using Collaborative Groups | 3 |
| 18 | 143 |
About Natasha M. Speer
Natasha M. Speer is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Theoretical Computer Science and Education, having authored 18 papers that have together received 750 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (14 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (7 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (684 citations), Statistics and Probability (153 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (190 citations). Natasha M. Speer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Julia Aguirre, Joseph F. Wagner, John P. Smith, Heather Howell, Karen King, Teri J. Murphy, Ginger V. Shultz, Tessa C. Andrews, Shandy Hauk and Sharon Strickland. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Cognition and Instruction and Educational Studies in Mathematics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.