Nancy Bell

2.8k citations
63 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Nancy Bell

58 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Nancy Bell
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Language and Linguistics 499
  • Literature and Literary Theory 449
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 439
  • Conservation 106
  • Social Psychology 580
Replace Arnulf Deppermann with:
Arnulf Deppermann Germany
Charles Keil United States
Peter Medway Canada
Teresa Cremin United Kingdom
Maurice Nevile Australia
Lisa F. Smith United States
Peggy Phelan United States
Janice M. Lauer United States
Jill Brody United States
Sarah Ransdell United States
Nancy Bell relative to Arnulf Deppermann Germany Arnulf Deppermann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26.5×
Arnulf Deppermann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Bell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Bell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Bell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Bell. The network helps show where Nancy Bell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Bell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy Bell Line = papers co-authored together Nancy Bell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200598
2 200994
3 200788
4 200878
5 201174
6 200772
7 201058
8 201548
9 201148
10 198545
11 200740
12 201237
13 201237
14 201536
15 200633
16 201130
17 200728
18 201524
19 201524
20 201521

About Nancy Bell

Nancy Bell is a scholar working on Conservation, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Space and Planetary Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Humor Studies and Applications (19 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (16 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (15 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (14 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (13 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (7 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (6 papers) and Second Language Learning and Teaching (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (499 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (449 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (439 citations), Conservation (106 citations) and Social Psychology (580 citations). Nancy Bell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Anne Pomerantz, Salvatore Attardo, Anne‐Nelly Perret‐Clermont, Matija Strlič, Stephen Skalicky, Catherine Dillon, Barbara Rogoff, Eugene Matusov, Kalliopi Fouseki and Cynthia M. Berger. Their work appears in journals such as Heritage Science, Journal of Pragmatics, Studies in Conservation, Humor - International Journal of Humor Research and Intercultural Pragmatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026