Conservation

144.3k papers and 974.7k indexed citations

About

144.3k papers covering Conservation have received a total of 974.7k indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Historical Art and Architecture Studies, Conservation Techniques and Studies and Digital and Traditional Archives Management and also cover the fields of Archeology, History and Earth-Surface Processes. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Archeology, Earth-Surface Processes and Sociology and Political Science. Some of the most active scholars covering Conservation are Robert C. Hastings, Abdeen Mustafa Omer, Robin J. H. Clark, Tanya Long Bennett, Philippe Colomban, Laurajane Smith, Terry Cook, Αντωνία Μοροπούλου, Jieying Zhang and Mark L. DeFond.

In The Last Decade

Conservation

18.3k papers receiving 108.4k citations

Countries where authors publish papers about Conservation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conservation more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers about Conservation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Conservation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Conservation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026