Studies in Conservation

3.9k papers and 40.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.9k papers published in Studies in Conservation in the last decades have received a total of 40.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in Conservation usually cover Archeology (2.0k papers), Conservation (1.5k papers) and Earth-Surface Processes (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Conservation Techniques and Studies (1.5k papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (1.5k papers) and Building materials and conservation (995 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in Conservation are E. René de la Rie, David A. Scott, John Mills, Jan Wouters, R. White, Andrew Oddy, Joyce Plesters, David Scott, N. S. Brommelle and Paul Garside.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies in Conservation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in Conservation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in Conservation.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in Conservation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in Conservation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025