Annals of the International Communication AssociationUnited States
Western Journal of CommunicationUnited States
Communication TheoryUnited States
Media PsychologyUnited States
Monographs of the Society for Research in Child DevelopmentUnited States
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyUnited States
Southern Communication JournalUnited States
Philosophy and RhetoricUnited States
Discourse StudiesUnited States
Humor - International Journal of Humor Researchrelative toEmotion ReviewUnited StatesEmotion Review's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Emotion Review · 1×
×0.712k/16kSP
×0.55k/10kECP
×2.84k/1kLLT
×2.82k/771GS
×0.32k/6kSPS
Citations per year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Humor - International Journal of Humor Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Humor - International Journal of Humor Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Humor - International Journal of Humor Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Humor - International Journal of Humor Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Humor - International Journal of Humor Research
This network shows the impact of papers published in Humor - International Journal of Humor Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Humor - International Journal of Humor Research.
About Humor - International Journal of Humor Research
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.