Lisa F. Smith

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
46 papers, 987 citations indexed

About

Lisa F. Smith is a scholar working on Education, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lisa F. Smith has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 987 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Education, 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 11 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Lisa F. Smith's work include Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (9 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (8 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (6 papers). Lisa F. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (9 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (8 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (6 papers). Lisa F. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Netherlands. Lisa F. Smith's co-authors include Jeffrey K. Smith, Paul J. Locher, Alison Gilmore, Megan E. Welsh, Alex J. Bowers, James H. McMillan, Michael T. Stevens, Susan M. Brookhart, Thomas R. Guskey and Pablo P. L. Tinio and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.

In The Last Decade

Lisa F. Smith

44 papers receiving 889 citations

Hit Papers

A Century of Grading Research 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lisa F. Smith United States 14 378 353 236 185 119 46 987
Keith Millis United States 22 344 0.9× 536 1.5× 563 2.4× 175 0.9× 1.1k 9.1× 48 1.9k
GL Claxton India 10 271 0.7× 320 0.9× 223 0.9× 149 0.8× 210 1.8× 31 928
Ed S. Tan Netherlands 16 77 0.2× 234 0.7× 297 1.3× 299 1.6× 86 0.7× 39 1.3k
Ralph A. Smith United States 16 320 0.8× 173 0.5× 346 1.5× 103 0.6× 69 0.6× 124 1.3k
Michael Feder United States 10 461 1.2× 113 0.3× 119 0.5× 211 1.1× 279 2.3× 22 1.2k
Susan O’Neill United Kingdom 16 293 0.8× 835 2.4× 228 1.0× 474 2.6× 156 1.3× 49 1.5k
Lois Hetland United States 12 384 1.0× 296 0.8× 362 1.5× 142 0.8× 126 1.1× 18 1.1k
Jennifer L. Jipson United States 9 326 0.9× 106 0.3× 83 0.4× 231 1.2× 483 4.1× 15 891
Berys Gaut United Kingdom 14 36 0.1× 333 0.9× 295 1.3× 158 0.9× 23 0.2× 35 919
David S. Miall Canada 22 188 0.5× 262 0.7× 722 3.1× 380 2.1× 270 2.3× 77 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa F. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa F. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa F. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa F. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa F. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa F. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa F. Smith. The network helps show where Lisa F. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa F. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa F. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa F. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa F. Smith. Lisa F. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Smith, Lisa F., et al.. (2024). A Universe of Sound: processing NASA data into sonifications to explore participant response. Frontiers in Communication. 9. 2 indexed citations
2.
Cotter, Katherine N., Alexander P. Christensen, Jeffrey K. Smith, et al.. (2023). Updating the Aesthetic Fluency Scale: Revised long and short forms for research in the psychology of the arts. PLoS ONE. 18(2). e0281547–e0281547. 7 indexed citations
3.
Berg, David A. G. & Lisa F. Smith. (2018). The Effect of School-Based Experience on Preservice Teachers' Self-Efficacy Beliefs.. Issues in educational research. 28(3). 530–544. 19 indexed citations
4.
Smith, Lisa F., et al.. (2017). Language teacher cognitions and intercultural language teaching: The New Zealand perspective. Language Teaching Research. 22(3). 310–329. 45 indexed citations
5.
Brookhart, Susan M., Thomas R. Guskey, Alex J. Bowers, et al.. (2016). A Century of Grading Research. Review of Educational Research. 86(4). 803–848. 228 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Page, Angela & Lisa F. Smith. (2015). Relational aggression and physical aggression among adolescent Cook Islands students. Issues in educational research. 26(1). 98–116. 3 indexed citations
7.
Berg, David A. G. & Lisa F. Smith. (2014). Pre-service teachers' efficacy beliefs and concerns in Malaysia, England and New Zealand. Issues in educational research. 24(1). 21–40. 13 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Lisa F., et al.. (2014). Context, Curriculum, and Community Matter: Leadership Practices of Primary School Principals in the Otago Province of New Zealand. The rural educator. 36(1). 1. 4 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Jeffrey K. & Lisa F. Smith. (2014). Replicability? Not that again!. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts. 8(1). 21–23. 2 indexed citations
10.
Page, Angela & Lisa F. Smith. (2012). Identifying girls who use relational aggression: A proposed model. Issues in educational research. 22(3). 315–332. 2 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Jeffrey K., et al.. (2011). Students' self-perception of reading ability, enjoyment of reading and reading achievement. Learning and Individual Differences. 22(2). 202–206. 88 indexed citations
12.
Hill, Mary, Bronwen Cowie, Alison Gilmore, & Lisa F. Smith. (2010). Preparing assessment-capable teachers: What should preservice teachers know and be able to do?. 2. 43–64. 21 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Lisa F., et al.. (2008). The Effects of Instructional Consistency: Using Manipulatives and Teaching Strategies to Support Resource Room Mathematics Instruction.. 15(2). 71–76. 5 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Jeffrey K. & Lisa F. Smith. (2008). The Structure of Artistic and Aesthetic Abilities in School Children. Empirical Studies of the Arts. 26(1). 117–130. 4 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Lisa F., et al.. (2007). Effectiveness and Tolerability of Istradefylline for the Treatment of Restless Legs Syndrome: An Exploratory Study in Five Female Patients. Current Therapeutic Research. 68(5). 349–359. 14 indexed citations
16.
Guskey, Thomas R., et al.. (2006). Literacy Assessment, New Zealand Style.. Educational leadership. 64(2). 74–79. 2 indexed citations
17.
Larson, Kent, et al.. (2006). Enhanced visual experiences and seeing hardware for reduced vision: A pilot study. Optometry. 77(2). 88–92. 2 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Lisa F. & Jeffrey K. Smith. (2002). Relation of Test-Specific Motivation and Anxiety to Test Performance. Psychological Reports. 91(3). 1011–1021. 21 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Jeffrey K., Lisa F. Smith, & Richard De Lisi. (2001). Natural classroom assessment : designing seamless instruction & assessment. Corwin Press eBooks. 12 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Jeffrey K. & Lisa F. Smith. (2001). Spending Time on Art. Empirical Studies of the Arts. 19(2). 229–236. 121 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026