Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Century of Grading Research
2016228 citationsSusan M. Brookhart, Thomas R. Guskey et al.Review of Educational Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa F. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa F. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa F. Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa F. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa F. Smith. The network helps show where Lisa F. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa F. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa F. Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa F. Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa F. Smith. Lisa F. Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Berg, David A. G. & Lisa F. Smith. (2018). The Effect of School-Based Experience on Preservice Teachers' Self-Efficacy Beliefs.. Issues in educational research. 28(3). 530–544.19 indexed citations
Brookhart, Susan M., Thomas R. Guskey, Alex J. Bowers, et al.. (2016). A Century of Grading Research. Review of Educational Research. 86(4). 803–848.228 indexed citations breakdown →
Berg, David A. G. & Lisa F. Smith. (2014). Pre-service teachers' efficacy beliefs and concerns in Malaysia, England and New Zealand. Issues in educational research. 24(1). 21–40.13 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Lisa F., et al.. (2014). Context, Curriculum, and Community Matter: Leadership Practices of Primary School Principals in the Otago Province of New Zealand. The rural educator. 36(1). 1.4 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Jeffrey K. & Lisa F. Smith. (2014). Replicability? Not that again!. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts. 8(1). 21–23.2 indexed citations
10.
Page, Angela & Lisa F. Smith. (2012). Identifying girls who use relational aggression: A proposed model. Issues in educational research. 22(3). 315–332.2 indexed citations
Smith, Lisa F., et al.. (2008). The Effects of Instructional Consistency: Using Manipulatives and Teaching Strategies to Support Resource Room Mathematics Instruction.. 15(2). 71–76.5 indexed citations
Smith, Jeffrey K., Lisa F. Smith, & Richard De Lisi. (2001). Natural classroom assessment : designing seamless instruction & assessment. Corwin Press eBooks.12 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Jeffrey K. & Lisa F. Smith. (2001). Spending Time on Art. Empirical Studies of the Arts. 19(2). 229–236.121 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.