Intercultural Pragmatics

466 papers and 5.9k indexed citations

About

The 466 papers published in Intercultural Pragmatics in the last decades have received a total of 5.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Intercultural Pragmatics usually cover Language and Linguistics (355 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (212 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (157 papers) specifically the topics of Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (285 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (191 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (145 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Intercultural Pragmatics are Jan Blommaert, Michael Haugh, Cliff Goddard, J. César Félix‐Brasdefer, Marta Dynel, Boaz Keysar, Juliane House, Andrew D. Cohen, Anne Barron and Alessandro Capone.

In The Last Decade

Intercultural Pragmatics

412 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Intercultural Pragmatics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Intercultural Pragmatics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Intercultural Pragmatics.

Countries where authors publish in Intercultural Pragmatics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Intercultural Pragmatics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Intercultural Pragmatics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intercultural Pragmatics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026