Intercultural Pragmatics

447 papers and 5.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 447 papers published in Intercultural Pragmatics in the last decades have received a total of 5.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Intercultural Pragmatics usually cover Language and Linguistics (344 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (204 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (156 papers) specifically the topics of Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (276 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (184 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (144 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Intercultural Pragmatics are Jan Blommaert, Cliff Goddard, Michael Haugh, J. César Félix‐Brasdefer, Boaz Keysar, Marta Dynel, Andrew D. Cohen, Juliane House, Anne Barron and Gerard J. Steen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Intercultural Pragmatics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Intercultural Pragmatics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Intercultural Pragmatics.

Countries where authors publish in Intercultural Pragmatics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Intercultural Pragmatics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Intercultural Pragmatics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intercultural Pragmatics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025