Space and Planetary Science

27.3k papers and 229.7k indexed citations i.

About

27.3k papers covering Space and Planetary Science have received a total of 229.7k indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Archaeological Remote Sensing using Remote Sensing Techniques, 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage and Archaeology and ancient environmental studies and also cover the fields of Archeology, Geology and Paleontology. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Archeology, Geology and Paleontology. Some of the most active scholars covering Space and Planetary Science are James K. Feathers, Bruce G. Trigger, V. Mejdahl, Lynn Meskell, David B. Small, Emmanuel P. Baltsavias, Cornelius Holtorf, John W. Rick, Άθως Αγαπίου and Rosa Lasaponara.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Space and Planetary Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Space and Planetary Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Space and Planetary Science.

Countries where authors publish papers about Space and Planetary Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Space and Planetary Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Space and Planetary Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Space and Planetary Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025