Janice M. Lauer

1.0k citations
23 papers · 668 indexed · h-index 10

Janice M. Lauer

19 papers receiving 495 citations

Peers

Janice M. Lauer
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Education 230
  • Literature and Literary Theory 222
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 222
  • Social Psychology 209
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 123
Replace J. William Asher with:
J. William Asher United States
Ravinder Koul United States
Gary M. Shulman United States
Mustafa Altan Türkiye
Letty Chan United Kingdom
Garry Hoban Australia
Steven A. Beebe United States
Jacquelyn Baker‐Sennett United States
Yoshiyuki Nakata Japan
Tamara L. Jetton United States
Janice M. Lauer relative to J. William Asher United States J. William Asher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
J. William Asher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janice M. Lauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janice M. Lauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice M. Lauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice M. Lauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janice M. Lauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice M. Lauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice M. Lauer. The network helps show where Janice M. Lauer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janice M. Lauer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janice M. Lauer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janice M. Lauer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janice M. Lauer. Janice M. Lauer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 6
2
A Response to "The History of Composition: Reclaiming Our Lost Generations"
0
3
Perspectives On Rhetorical Invention
35
4
Disciplinary Formation: The Summer of Rhetoric Seminar.
2
5 2
6 17
7 5
8 0
9
A meta-analysis of recent research in the teaching of writing: workshops, computer applications, and inquiry
1
10 239
11
Can achievement motivation theory succeed with only one conception of success
31
12 135
13 44
14 18
15 5
16 5
17 0
18 2
19 15
20 2

About Janice M. Lauer

Janice M. Lauer is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Philosophy, having authored 23 papers that have together received 668 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (7 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (3 papers) and Literacy, Media, and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (222 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (222 citations) and Social Psychology (209 citations). Janice M. Lauer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John G. Nicholls, Michael Patashnick, Ping Chung Cheung, J. William Asher, Betty Bamberg, Ulla Connor, Janet M. Atwill, Andrea A. Lunsford, Janet Emig and Theresa A. Thorkildsen. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Immunology, Learning and Individual Differences and College Composition and Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026