Nadia K. Byrnes

588 total citations
11 papers, 419 citations indexed

About

Nadia K. Byrnes is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Food Science and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Nadia K. Byrnes has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 419 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics, 5 papers in Food Science and 4 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Nadia K. Byrnes's work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers) and Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (3 papers). Nadia K. Byrnes is often cited by papers focused on Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers) and Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (3 papers). Nadia K. Byrnes collaborates with scholars based in United States. Nadia K. Byrnes's co-authors include John E. Hayes, Bradley L. Nilsson, Todd M. Doran, Hildegarde Heymann, Aude A. Watrelot, James A. Kennedy, Ellena S. King, Dawn M. Chapman, Guangwei Huang and Alyson E. Mitchell and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics and Appetite.

In The Last Decade

Nadia K. Byrnes

10 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nadia K. Byrnes United States 9 191 185 156 56 55 11 419
Eliza Kostyra Poland 15 248 1.3× 153 0.8× 89 0.6× 47 0.8× 69 1.3× 38 548
John Lawlor Ireland 16 425 2.2× 230 1.2× 99 0.6× 69 1.2× 43 0.8× 31 708
R.M.A.J. Ruijschop Netherlands 11 152 0.8× 214 1.2× 154 1.0× 69 1.2× 13 0.2× 20 391
Saara Pentikäinen Finland 13 171 0.9× 176 1.0× 45 0.3× 29 0.5× 37 0.7× 27 452
Barbara Vad Andersen Denmark 13 226 1.2× 133 0.7× 104 0.7× 16 0.3× 40 0.7× 30 457
Maria A. A. P. da Silva Brazil 9 352 1.8× 300 1.6× 192 1.2× 39 0.7× 83 1.5× 9 702
Alexandra E. M. Boelrijk Netherlands 18 315 1.6× 336 1.8× 252 1.6× 94 1.7× 33 0.6× 26 813
Julia Low Australia 12 235 1.2× 306 1.7× 181 1.2× 13 0.2× 24 0.4× 25 488
Rebecca Ford United Kingdom 14 297 1.6× 201 1.1× 131 0.8× 26 0.5× 70 1.3× 29 462
Heston Blumenthal United Kingdom 4 144 0.8× 124 0.7× 138 0.9× 26 0.5× 38 0.7× 7 352

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia K. Byrnes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia K. Byrnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia K. Byrnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia K. Byrnes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia K. Byrnes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia K. Byrnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia K. Byrnes. The network helps show where Nadia K. Byrnes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia K. Byrnes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia K. Byrnes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia K. Byrnes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia K. Byrnes. Nadia K. Byrnes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Lerno, Larry, et al.. (2021). Impact of Dry Hopping on Beer Flavor Stability. Foods. 10(6). 1264–1264. 8 indexed citations
2.
Byrnes, Nadia K., et al.. (2019). Rejection of labrusca-type aromas in wine differs by wine expertise and geographic region. Food Quality and Preference. 74. 147–154. 11 indexed citations
3.
King, Ellena S., et al.. (2018). Flavor and Acceptance of Roasted California Almonds During Accelerated Storage. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 66(5). 1222–1232. 31 indexed citations
4.
Watrelot, Aude A., Nadia K. Byrnes, Hildegarde Heymann, & James A. Kennedy. (2016). Understanding the Relationship between Red Wine Matrix, Tannin Activity, and Sensory Properties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 64(47). 9116–9123. 23 indexed citations
6.
Byrnes, Nadia K., et al.. (2015). Perception of chemesthetic stimuli in groups who differ by food involvement and culinary experience. Food Quality and Preference. 46. 142–150. 13 indexed citations
7.
Byrnes, Nadia K. & John E. Hayes. (2015). Gender differences in the influence of personality traits on spicy food liking and intake. Food Quality and Preference. 42. 12–19. 64 indexed citations
8.
Byrnes, Nadia K., Michael A. Nestrud, & John E. Hayes. (2015). Perceptual Mapping of Chemesthetic Stimuli in Naive Assessors. Chemosensory Perception. 8(1). 19–32. 10 indexed citations
9.
Byrnes, Nadia K. & John E. Hayes. (2012). Personality factors predict spicy food liking and intake. Food Quality and Preference. 28(1). 213–221. 125 indexed citations
10.
Byrnes, Nadia K.. (2011). Evaluating the Stability of Purple Corncob Extract in Tortilla Chips. OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network). 1 indexed citations
11.
Doran, Todd M., et al.. (2011). Role of amino acid hydrophobicity, aromaticity, and molecular volume on IAPP(20–29) amyloid self‐assembly. Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics. 80(4). 1053–1065. 61 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026