Appetite
About
In The Last Decade
Appetite
7.7k papers receiving 272.7k citations
Fields of papers published in Appetite
This network shows the impact of papers published in Appetite. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Appetite.
Countries where authors publish in Appetite
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Appetite. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Appetite with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Appetite more than expected).
- Development of a Measure of the Motives Underlying the Selection of Food: the Food Choice Questionnaire (1995)
- Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans (1992)
- Confirmatory factor analysis of the Child Feeding Questionnaire: a measure of parental attitudes, beliefs and practices about child feeding and obesity proneness (2001)
- Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance—A review (2008)
- Food Choice: A Conceptual Model of the Process (1996)
- Influence of gender, age and motives underlying food choice on perceived healthiness and willingness to try functional foods (2007)
- Beyond-brand effect of television (TV) food advertisements/commercials on caloric intake and food choice of 5–7-year-old children (2006)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.