Michael Filsecker

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 759 citations indexed

About

Michael Filsecker is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Filsecker has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 759 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Education and 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Michael Filsecker's work include Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers). Michael Filsecker is often cited by papers focused on Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers). Michael Filsecker collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Chile. Michael Filsecker's co-authors include Jennifer A. Fredricks, Michael A. Lawson, Daniel T. Hickey, Michael Kerres, Hermann Josef Abs and Nina Roczen and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers & Education, Learning and Instruction and European Journal of Psychological Assessment.

In The Last Decade

Michael Filsecker

9 papers receiving 719 citations

Hit Papers

Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing d... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Filsecker Germany 5 431 302 151 119 105 9 759
Eva Dobozy Australia 10 540 1.3× 208 0.7× 117 0.8× 106 0.9× 92 0.9× 42 805
Mervyn J. Wighting United States 8 604 1.4× 264 0.9× 157 1.0× 138 1.2× 98 0.9× 24 849
Mingming Zhou Macao 17 322 0.7× 181 0.6× 153 1.0× 111 0.9× 51 0.5× 40 717
Wenye Zhou China 9 433 1.0× 145 0.5× 209 1.4× 75 0.6× 76 0.7× 10 719
Minna Puustinen France 12 513 1.2× 558 1.8× 96 0.6× 167 1.4× 83 0.8× 24 904
Marion Händel Germany 15 411 1.0× 269 0.9× 112 0.7× 114 1.0× 165 1.6× 40 837
Lucas M. Jeno Norway 14 289 0.7× 156 0.5× 243 1.6× 85 0.7× 145 1.4× 22 718
Lucia Ronconi Italy 4 414 1.0× 326 1.1× 265 1.8× 65 0.5× 72 0.7× 9 819
Shaoying Gong China 18 384 0.9× 231 0.8× 282 1.9× 107 0.9× 87 0.8× 39 828
Ruth Harmsen Netherlands 6 560 1.3× 333 1.1× 172 1.1× 65 0.5× 90 0.9× 8 907

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Filsecker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Filsecker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Filsecker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Filsecker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Filsecker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Filsecker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Filsecker. The network helps show where Michael Filsecker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Filsecker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Filsecker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Filsecker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Filsecker. Michael Filsecker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Filsecker, Michael & Michael Kerres. (2020). Repositioning Formative Assessment from an Educational Assessment Perspective: A Response to Dunn & Mulvenon (2009). Practical assessment, research & evaluation. 17(16). 16. 6 indexed citations
2.
Filsecker, Michael, Hermann Josef Abs, & Nina Roczen. (2019). The Structure of Conflict Styles in Adolescents. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 36(4). 525–536. 4 indexed citations
3.
Roczen, Nina, Hermann Josef Abs, & Michael Filsecker. (2017). How school influences adolescents’ conflict styles. Journal of Peace Education. 14(3). 325–346. 4 indexed citations
4.
Fredricks, Jennifer A., Michael Filsecker, & Michael A. Lawson. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction. 43. 1–4. 515 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Filsecker, Michael & Michael Kerres. (2014). Engagement as a Volitional Construct. Simulation & Gaming. 45(4-5). 450–470. 48 indexed citations
6.
Filsecker, Michael & Daniel T. Hickey. (2014). A multilevel analysis of the effects of external rewards on elementary students' motivation, engagement and learning in an educational game. Computers & Education. 75. 136–148. 175 indexed citations
7.
Filsecker, Michael & Daniel T. Hickey. (2013). Incentives in Educational Games: A Multilevel Analysis of Their Impact on Elementary Students' Engagement and Learning.. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. 208–215. 2 indexed citations
8.
Hickey, Daniel T. & Michael Filsecker. (2012). Participatory assessment for organizing inquiry in educational videogames and beyond. 2 indexed citations
9.
Filsecker, Michael, et al.. (2008). Aprendizaje implícito en usuarios intensivos de videojuegos. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto). 18(39). 165–174. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026