Ruth Harmsen
- Education top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ard W. LazonderRidwan MaulanaKlaas van VeenMichelle Helms‐LorenzHans van der MeijJan van der MeijMarc van Veldhoven
- Topics
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers)Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers)Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers)
- Journals
- Review of Educational ResearchBritish Journal of Educational PsychologyEducational Technology Research and Development
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ruth Harmsen
8 papers receiving 861 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Education 560
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 333
- Social Psychology 172
- Clinical Psychology 116
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 95
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Harmsen
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Harmsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Harmsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Harmsen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Harmsen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Harmsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Harmsen. The network helps show where Ruth Harmsen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Harmsen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Harmsen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Harmsen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Harmsen. Ruth Harmsen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33 | |
| 2 | 39 | |
| 3 | The relationship between beginning teachers’ stress causes, stress responses, teaching behaviour and attritionbreakdown → | 221 |
| 4 | Beginning teachers’ perceived stress: Causes, responses, and relationships with teaching behavior and attrition | 1 |
| 5 | Meta-Analysis of Inquiry-Based Learningbreakdown → | 537 |
| 6 | 69 | |
| 7 | Supporting Inquiry Learning: A Meta-Analysis | 1 |
| 8 | Animated pedagogical agents: do they advance student motivation and learning in an inquiry learning environment? | 6 |
About Ruth Harmsen
Ruth Harmsen is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 907 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (333 citations), Education (560 citations) and Computer Science Applications (65 citations). Ruth Harmsen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ard W. Lazonder, Ridwan Maulana, Klaas van Veen, Michelle Helms‐Lorenz, Hans van der Meij, Jan van der Meij and Marc van Veldhoven. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Educational Research, British Journal of Educational Psychology and Educational Technology Research and Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.