Melanie Ashleigh

45 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Melanie Ashleigh
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Education 473
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 271
  • Social Psychology 235
  • Management Science and Operations Research 177
  • Strategy and Management 176
Replace Helen Higson with:
Helen Higson United Kingdom
Misty L. Loughry United States
Saša Batistič Netherlands
David Birchall United Kingdom
Miguel Baptista Nunes United Kingdom
Derrick J. Neufeld Canada
Anoush Margaryan United Kingdom
Muhammad Shujahat Hong Kong
Mesut Akdere United States
Yu‐Qian Zhu Taiwan
Melanie Ashleigh relative to Helen Higson United Kingdom Helen Higson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Helen Higson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melanie Ashleigh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melanie Ashleigh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanie Ashleigh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanie Ashleigh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melanie Ashleigh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanie Ashleigh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanie Ashleigh. The network helps show where Melanie Ashleigh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Melanie Ashleigh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Melanie Ashleigh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Melanie Ashleigh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Melanie Ashleigh. Melanie Ashleigh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 9
2 36
3 11
4 4
5
The psychology of people in Organisations
0
6 3
7 2
8 27
9 84
10
CSR Is Knocking: A Call For HR To Join
2
11
Contemporary management: European edition
5
12
A guide to partnering workshops
1
13 16
14
Selecting the team
1
15 2
16
Trust and knowledge transfer: an explanatory framework for identifying relationships within communities of practice
2
17 13
18
TRUST AND TECHNOLOGIES: IMPLICATIONS FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORTED WORK PRACTICES
2
19 46
20 29

About Melanie Ashleigh

Melanie Ashleigh is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Communication and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Higher Education and Employability (10 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (9 papers) and Construction Project Management and Performance (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (271 citations), Communication (137 citations) and Education (473 citations). Melanie Ashleigh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yehuda Baruch, William E. Donald, Udechukwu Ojiako, Maxwell Chipulu, Jane Prichard, Neville A. Stanton, Stuart Maguire, Joe Nandhakumar, Denise Baden and Jaw‐Kai Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, International Journal of Project Management and Decision Support Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026