Jane Prichard

985 total citations
28 papers, 662 citations indexed

About

Jane Prichard is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Emergency Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Prichard has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 662 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in General Health Professions, 8 papers in Social Psychology and 7 papers in Emergency Medicine. Recurrent topics in Jane Prichard's work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (7 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (6 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers). Jane Prichard is often cited by papers focused on Emergency and Acute Care Studies (7 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (6 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers). Jane Prichard collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Saudi Arabia. Jane Prichard's co-authors include Robert Stratford, Lewis A. Bizo, Joanne Turnbull, Catherine Pope, Melanie Ashleigh, Susan Halford, Neville A. Stanton, Carl May, Melania Calestani and Anne Rogers and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Medical Internet Research and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

Jane Prichard

28 papers receiving 619 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Prichard United Kingdom 14 178 161 131 127 104 28 662
Linda C. Lederman United States 13 116 0.7× 147 0.9× 206 1.6× 119 0.9× 32 0.3× 31 847
Martha Reeves United States 5 166 0.9× 229 1.4× 106 0.8× 34 0.3× 20 0.2× 11 951
Slavi Stoyanov Netherlands 16 93 0.5× 47 0.3× 476 3.6× 167 1.3× 52 0.5× 55 1.1k
Jo Angouri United Kingdom 19 140 0.8× 87 0.5× 56 0.4× 19 0.1× 129 1.2× 60 1.1k
Kirsten McKenzie Australia 15 135 0.8× 136 0.8× 496 3.8× 64 0.5× 168 1.6× 46 1.3k
Craig Locatis United States 15 202 1.1× 23 0.1× 129 1.0× 109 0.9× 66 0.6× 59 821
Phillip J. Decker United States 15 111 0.6× 132 0.8× 70 0.5× 94 0.7× 13 0.1× 46 703
Juliane E. Kämmer Germany 15 86 0.5× 71 0.4× 45 0.3× 22 0.2× 101 1.0× 40 815
James A. Grand United States 17 96 0.5× 325 2.0× 32 0.2× 20 0.2× 73 0.7× 36 1.0k
Craig Zimitat Australia 16 127 0.7× 142 0.9× 375 2.9× 73 0.6× 9 0.1× 57 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Prichard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Prichard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Prichard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Prichard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Prichard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Prichard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Prichard. The network helps show where Jane Prichard may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Prichard

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Prichard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Prichard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Prichard. Jane Prichard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Turnbull, Joanne, Iain Atherton, Anne Marie Rafferty, et al.. (2024). What might make nurses stay? A protocol for discrete choice experiments to understand NHS nurses’ preferences at early-career and late-career stages. BMJ Open. 14(2). e075066–e075066. 4 indexed citations
2.
Turnbull, Joanne, Jane Prichard, Jennifer MacLellan, & Catherine Pope. (2024). eHealth Literacy and the Use of NHS 111 Online Urgent Care Service in England: Cross-Sectional Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 26. e50376–e50376. 3 indexed citations
3.
Turnbull, Joanne, Anne Marie Rafferty, Jane Prichard, et al.. (2024). Coming and going: A narrative review exploring the push-pull factors during nurses' careers. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 160. 104908–104908. 8 indexed citations
4.
5.
MacLellan, Jennifer, Joanne Turnbull, Jane Prichard, & Catherine Pope. (2023). Emergency department staff views of NHS 111 First: qualitative interview study in England. Emergency Medicine Journal. 40(9). 636–640. 3 indexed citations
6.
Turnbull, Joanne, Jennifer MacLellan, Kate Churruca, et al.. (2023). A multimethod study of NHS 111 online. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11(5). 1–104. 1 indexed citations
7.
Gobbi, Mary, et al.. (2021). Home and expatriate nurses’ perceptions of job satisfaction: Qualitative findings. International Nursing Review. 69(2). 125–131. 10 indexed citations
8.
Gobbi, Mary, et al.. (2020). The association between nationality and nurse job satisfaction in Saudi Arabian hospitals. International Nursing Review. 67(3). 420–426. 12 indexed citations
9.
Turnbull, Joanne, et al.. (2019). Sense-making strategies and help-seeking behaviours associated with urgent care services: a mixed-methods study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(26). 1–122. 18 indexed citations
10.
Turnbull, Joanne, et al.. (2019). A conceptual model of urgent care sense-making and help-seeking: a qualitative interview study of urgent care users in England. BMC Health Services Research. 19(1). 481–481. 17 indexed citations
11.
Pope, Catherine, et al.. (2017). Has the NHS 111 urgent care telephone service been a success? Case study and secondary data analysis in England. BMJ Open. 7(5). e014815–e014815. 49 indexed citations
12.
Turnbull, Joanne, et al.. (2017). Risk work in NHS 111: the everyday work of managing risk in telephone assessment using a computer decision support system. Health Risk & Society. 19(3-4). 189–208. 15 indexed citations
13.
Prichard, Jane, Joanne Turnbull, Susan Halford, & Catherine Pope. (2014). Trusting technical change in call centres. Work Employment and Society. 28(5). 808–824. 11 indexed citations
14.
Ruch, Gillian, et al.. (2014). Getting Beneath the Surface: Scapegoating and the Systems Approach in a Post-Munro World. Journal of Social Work Practice. 28(3). 313–327. 7 indexed citations
15.
Pope, Catherine, Susan Halford, Joanne Turnbull, et al.. (2013). Using computer decision support systems in NHS emergency and urgent care: ethnographic study using normalisation process theory. BMC Health Services Research. 13(1). 111–111. 74 indexed citations
16.
Turnbull, Joanne, Jane Prichard, Susan Halford, Catherine Pope, & Chris Salisbury. (2012). Reconfiguring the emergency and urgent care workforce: Mixed methods study of skills and the everyday work of non-clinical call-handlers in the NHS. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 17(4). 233–240. 22 indexed citations
17.
Ashleigh, Melanie & Jane Prichard. (2011). An Integrative Model of the Role of Trust in Transactive Memory Development. Group & Organization Management. 37(1). 5–35. 27 indexed citations
18.
Prichard, Jane, Lewis A. Bizo, & Robert Stratford. (2010). Evaluating the effects of team-skills training on subjective workload. Learning and Instruction. 21(3). 429–440. 24 indexed citations
19.
Prichard, Jane, Lewis A. Bizo, & Robert Stratford. (2006). The educational impact of team‐skills training: Preparing students to work in groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 76(1). 119–140. 87 indexed citations
20.
Prichard, Jane & Neville A. Stanton. (1999). Testing Belbin’s team role theory of effective groups. Journal of Management Development. 18(8). 652–665. 56 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Linda C. Lederman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Martha Reeves Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Slavi Stoyanov Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jo Angouri Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kirsten McKenzie Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Craig Locatis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Phillip J. Decker Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Juliane E. Kämmer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by James A. Grand Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Craig Zimitat
Rankless by CCL
2026