Mark Lachowicz

15 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Mark Lachowicz
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Applied Psychology 86
  • Clinical Psychology 137
  • Health 51
  • Social Psychology 99
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 58
Replace J. Jackson Barnette with:
J. Jackson Barnette United States
M.K. Ward United States
Ítalo Trizano-Hermosilla Chile
Daniel Seddig Germany
Sumaya Laher South Africa
Christopher Antoun United States
Henning Silber Germany
Yilin Andre Wang United States
Hripsime A. Kalaian United States
Pi‐Ju Liu United States
Mark Lachowicz relative to J. Jackson Barnette United States J. Jackson Barnette's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
J. Jackson Barnette · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Lachowicz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Lachowicz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Lachowicz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Lachowicz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Lachowicz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Lachowicz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Lachowicz. The network helps show where Mark Lachowicz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Lachowicz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Lachowicz Line = papers co-authored together Mark Lachowicz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2017182
2 2013102
3 201493
4 201438
5 201425
6 201924
7 201615
8 202015
9 20228
10 20156
11 20224
12 20173
13 20193
14 20231
15 20161
16 20220

About Mark Lachowicz

Mark Lachowicz is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 520 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (2 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (2 papers) and Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (86 citations), Clinical Psychology (137 citations), Health (51 citations), Social Psychology (99 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (58 citations). Mark Lachowicz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Kristopher J. Preacher, Ken Kelley, Terence M. Keane, Monica Roy, Amy Rubin, Justin L. Enggasser, David Rosenbloom, Deborah J. Brief, John A. Hermos and Eric Helmuth. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, Psychological Methods, Personal Relationships, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations and Psychological Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact