Psychological Methods

1.3k papers and 209.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Psychological Methods in the last decades have received a total of 209.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychological Methods usually cover Statistics and Probability (433 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (331 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (324 papers) specifically the topics of Mental Health Research Topics (290 papers), Measurement Invariance in Structural Equation Modeling (241 papers) and Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (192 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychological Methods are Robert C. MacCallum, Joseph L. Schafer, Niall Bolger, J. A. Graham, Patrick E. Shrout, Peter M. Bentler, Li‐tze Hu, Kristopher J. Preacher, Patrick J. Curran and Stephen G. West.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychological Methods

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychological Methods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychological Methods.

Countries where authors publish in Psychological Methods

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychological Methods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychological Methods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychological Methods more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025