Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

1.4k papers and 38.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations in the last decades have received a total of 38.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations usually cover Sociology and Political Science (1.2k papers), Social Psychology (885 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (259 papers) specifically the topics of Social and Intergroup Psychology (1.1k papers), Cultural Differences and Values (608 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (244 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations are Miles Hewstone, Richard J. Crisp, John F. Dovidio, Maykel Verkuyten, Linda R. Tropp, Alberto Voci, Dominic Abrams, Gordon Hodson, J. Nicole Shelton and Jim Sidanius.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.

Countries where authors publish in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Group Processes & Intergroup Relations more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025