Mark Harcourt

1.1k total citations
58 papers, 706 citations indexed

About

Mark Harcourt is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Harcourt has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 706 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Public Administration, 22 papers in General Health Professions and 16 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Mark Harcourt's work include Labor Movements and Unions (35 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (20 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (15 papers). Mark Harcourt is often cited by papers focused on Labor Movements and Unions (35 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (20 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (15 papers). Mark Harcourt collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Canada. Mark Harcourt's co-authors include Geoffrey Wood, Helen Lam, Adrian Wilkinson, Jenny Gibb, Elsa Underhill, Gregor Gall, Matt Flynn, Richard Croucher, Ian Roper and Stephen P. Keef and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Industrial and Labor Relations Review and The International Journal of Human Resource Management.

In The Last Decade

Mark Harcourt

52 papers receiving 634 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Harcourt New Zealand 14 215 204 191 157 120 58 706
Peter Gahan Australia 15 265 1.2× 308 1.5× 187 1.0× 215 1.4× 175 1.5× 101 809
Olga Suhomlinova United Kingdom 13 195 0.9× 91 0.4× 144 0.8× 232 1.5× 69 0.6× 21 710
Jeffrey H. Keefe United States 14 174 0.8× 293 1.4× 174 0.9× 234 1.5× 103 0.9× 37 735
Ariane Hegewisch United Kingdom 12 278 1.3× 139 0.7× 139 0.7× 231 1.5× 171 1.4× 23 804
Amanda Pyman Australia 10 165 0.8× 153 0.8× 123 0.6× 276 1.8× 95 0.8× 39 648
Jonathan Morris United Kingdom 18 306 1.4× 232 1.1× 268 1.4× 396 2.5× 165 1.4× 40 967
Keith Whitfield United Kingdom 16 156 0.7× 265 1.3× 207 1.1× 246 1.6× 111 0.9× 43 821
Ramanie Samaratunge Australia 16 230 1.1× 83 0.4× 113 0.6× 195 1.2× 105 0.9× 75 864
David Fairris United States 16 213 1.0× 201 1.0× 240 1.3× 85 0.5× 105 0.9× 47 825
Rosemary Lucas United Kingdom 17 425 2.0× 166 0.8× 267 1.4× 351 2.2× 51 0.4× 56 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Harcourt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Harcourt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Harcourt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Harcourt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Harcourt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Harcourt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Harcourt. The network helps show where Mark Harcourt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Harcourt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Harcourt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Harcourt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Harcourt. Mark Harcourt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lam, Helen, et al.. (2024). Bring Your Own Device (BYOD): Organizational Control and Justice Perspectives. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. 37(4). 473–491.
2.
Lam, Helen & Mark Harcourt. (2024). Digital Addiction in Organizations: Challenges and Policy Implications. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. 36(4). 519–533. 5 indexed citations
4.
Harcourt, Mark, et al.. (2024). The union default: Free‐riding solutions. Industrial Relations Journal. 55(4). 267–284. 1 indexed citations
5.
Harcourt, Mark, et al.. (2023). The union default: Effects and implications of regulated opting‐out. Industrial Relations Journal. 54(2). 132–149. 1 indexed citations
6.
Hurd, Fiona, et al.. (2023). “They expect me to be caring”: the challenges of claiming an androgynous leadership approach. Gender in Management An International Journal. 38(6). 804–820.
7.
Harcourt, Mark, et al.. (2023). Making Union Membership the Default Option in Canada: Would It Be Supported and Effective?. Relations industrielles. 77(4). 1 indexed citations
8.
Harcourt, Mark, et al.. (2021). The potential of a union default to influence the preferences and choices of non-union workers in unionised workplaces. Economic and Industrial Democracy. 43(4). 1817–1841. 2 indexed citations
9.
Harcourt, Mark, et al.. (2019). Critiquing the OECD’s Employment Protection Legislation Index for individual dismissals: The importance of procedural requirements. Economic and Industrial Democracy. 42(4). 1210–1231. 2 indexed citations
10.
Harcourt, Mark & Helen Lam. (2012). Collaboration between unions in a multi-union, non-exclusive bargaining regime: What can Canada learn from New Zealand?. Research Commons (University of Waikato). 20(2). 5–29. 1 indexed citations
11.
Harcourt, Mark, et al.. (2012). Employment at Will versus Just Cause Dismissal: Applying the Due Process Model of Procedural Justice. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 64(2). 67–859. 4 indexed citations
12.
Harcourt, Mark, et al.. (2007). The Impact of Workers’ Compensation Experience-Rating on Discriminatory Hiring Practices. Journal of Economic Issues. 41(3). 681–699. 8 indexed citations
13.
Underhill, Elsa, Mark Harcourt, & Geoffrey Wood. (2007). Trade Unions and Democracy: Strategies and Perspectives. Labour History. 232–232. 30 indexed citations
14.
Harcourt, Mark, Geoffrey Wood, & Ian Roper. (2007). The Importance of Legislated Employment Mark Harcourt, Protection for Worker Commitment in Geoffrey Wood Coordinated Market Economies. Journal of Economic Issues. 41(4). 961–980. 10 indexed citations
15.
Harcourt, Mark & Geoffrey Wood. (2006). A Critique of Probationary Employment Periods. 31(2). 17. 3 indexed citations
16.
Harcourt, Mark & Helen Lam. (2006). Freedom of Association, Freedom of Contract, and the Right-to-Work Debate. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. 18(4). 249–266. 1 indexed citations
17.
Harcourt, Mark, et al.. (2005). Unions and Discriminatory Hiring: Evidence from New Zealand. Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society. 44(2). 364–372.
18.
Harcourt, Mark & Geoffrey Wood. (2003). Under What Circumstances Do Social Accords Work?. Journal of Economic Issues. 37(3). 747–767. 19 indexed citations
19.
Harcourt, Mark, et al.. (2002). Do Employers Comply With Civil/Human Rights Legislation? New Evidence From New Zealand Job Application Forms / Поступают ли наниматели в соответствии с правами человека и гражданским законодательством? Новые свидетельства из Новой Зеландии о заявлениях при приеме на работу.. Journal of Business Ethics. 35(3). 207–232. 6 indexed citations
20.
Harcourt, Mark, et al.. (2000). When Can an Employee Refuse Unsafe Work and Expect to be Protected from Discipline? Evidence from Canada. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 53(4). 684–684. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026