Elsa Underhill

29 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers

Elsa Underhill
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 156
  • Public Administration 108
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 24
  • General Health Professions 245
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 50
Replace Malcolm Rimmer with:
Malcolm Rimmer Australia
Babette Bronkhorst Netherlands
Felicity Lamm New Zealand
Pernille Hohnen Denmark
Terry Thomason Canada
Philip Leather United Kingdom
Malcolm Sargeant United Kingdom
James R. Chelius United States
John D. Worrall United States
Peter Philips United States
Elsa Underhill relative to Malcolm Rimmer Australia Malcolm Rimmer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Malcolm Rimmer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elsa Underhill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elsa Underhill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elsa Underhill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elsa Underhill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elsa Underhill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elsa Underhill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elsa Underhill. The network helps show where Elsa Underhill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Elsa Underhill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elsa Underhill Line = papers co-authored together Elsa Underhill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011136
2 200366
3 201556
4 201237
5 200730
6 201517
7 199316
8 201615
9 200912
10 201910
11
The Australian construction industry: union control in a disorganised industry
200310
12 20058
13 20247
14 20106
15 19986
16 20116
17 20175
18 19994
19 20114
20
The role of employment agencies in structuring and regulating labour markets
20054

About Elsa Underhill

Elsa Underhill is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, Demography and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (22 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (13 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (7 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (5 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (4 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (4 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (156 citations), Public Administration (108 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (24 citations), General Health Professions (245 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (50 citations). Elsa Underhill has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michael Quinlan, Malcolm Rimmer, Geoffrey Wood, Mark Harcourt, Mark Bray, Diane van den Broek, Dimitria Groutsis and Katherine Lippel. Their work appears in journals such as Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, Journal of Industrial Relations, Relations industrielles, Journal of Business Ethics and Labour History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact