Margaret A. Cliff

4.0k total citations
96 papers, 3.0k citations indexed

About

Margaret A. Cliff is a scholar working on Plant Science, Food Science and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Margaret A. Cliff has authored 96 papers receiving a total of 3.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 68 papers in Plant Science, 67 papers in Food Science and 19 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management. Recurrent topics in Margaret A. Cliff's work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (45 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (45 papers) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (31 papers). Margaret A. Cliff is often cited by papers focused on Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (45 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (45 papers) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (31 papers). Margaret A. Cliff collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Margaret A. Cliff's co-authors include Marjorie King, Andrew G. Reynolds, Hildegarde Heymann, Barry G. Green, M.C. Dever, Benôıt Girard, John W. Hall, P.M.A. Toivonen, Pascal Delaquis and Eunice C.Y. Li‐Chan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Dairy Science, Molecules and Food Research International.

In The Last Decade

Margaret A. Cliff

93 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Margaret A. Cliff Canada 32 1.9k 1.6k 558 513 393 96 3.0k
Richard Gawel Australia 18 2.2k 1.1× 1.4k 0.9× 472 0.8× 829 1.6× 227 0.6× 37 2.5k
P. X. Étiévant France 31 1.8k 0.9× 734 0.5× 629 1.1× 351 0.7× 548 1.4× 116 2.6k
Ronan Symoneaux France 26 1.5k 0.8× 927 0.6× 450 0.8× 256 0.5× 229 0.6× 87 2.3k
Luigi Moio Italy 42 3.7k 1.9× 2.3k 1.5× 557 1.0× 1.4k 2.8× 249 0.6× 155 4.7k
Kate Howell Australia 32 1.7k 0.9× 1.2k 0.8× 380 0.7× 394 0.8× 88 0.2× 95 2.9k
Kerry L. Wilkinson Australia 30 2.0k 1.0× 1.6k 1.0× 203 0.4× 759 1.5× 109 0.3× 125 2.6k
D. A. Heatherbell New Zealand 25 1.1k 0.6× 837 0.5× 250 0.4× 526 1.0× 116 0.3× 45 1.7k
Bénédicte Pineau New Zealand 17 1.2k 0.6× 523 0.3× 473 0.8× 193 0.4× 354 0.9× 25 1.5k
Charles A. Sims United States 35 1.5k 0.8× 2.6k 1.7× 562 1.0× 1.1k 2.1× 140 0.4× 186 4.5k
Alessandra Del Italy 29 1.4k 0.7× 1.0k 0.7× 650 1.2× 865 1.7× 61 0.2× 64 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Margaret A. Cliff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret A. Cliff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret A. Cliff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret A. Cliff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret A. Cliff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret A. Cliff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret A. Cliff. The network helps show where Margaret A. Cliff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret A. Cliff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret A. Cliff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret A. Cliff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret A. Cliff. Margaret A. Cliff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stanich, Kareen, et al.. (2021). Modelling and Classification of Apple Textural Attributes Using Sensory, Instrumental and Compositional Analyses. Foods. 10(2). 384–384. 23 indexed citations
3.
Stanich, Kareen, Margaret A. Cliff, & C.R. Hampson. (2016). Characterizing the Frequency Distributions for Fruit Firmness of Sweet Cherry Cultivars. HortScience. 51(6). 775–783. 2 indexed citations
4.
Cliff, Margaret A., et al.. (2013). Descriptive analysis and early-stage consumer acceptance of yogurts fermented with carrot juice. Journal of Dairy Science. 96(7). 4160–4172. 18 indexed citations
5.
Cliff, Margaret A. & Marjorie King. (2009). Influence of Serving Temperature and Wine Type on Perception of Ethyl Acetate and 4-ethyl Phenol in Wine. Journal of Wine Research. 20(1). 45–52. 8 indexed citations
6.
Cliff, Margaret A., et al.. (2006). Anthocyanin, phenolic composition, colour measurement and sensory analysis of BC commercial red wines. Food Research International. 40(1). 92–100. 180 indexed citations
7.
King, Marjorie & Margaret A. Cliff. (2005). EVALUATION OF IDEAL WINE AND CHEESE PAIRS USING A DEVIATION‐FROM‐IDEAL SCALE WITH FOOD AND WINE EXPERTS. Journal of Food Quality. 28(3). 245–256. 43 indexed citations
8.
Cliff, Margaret A., et al.. (2005). Odour-active components of simulated beef flavour analysed by solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and –olfactometry. Food Research International. 39(3). 294–308. 108 indexed citations
9.
King, Marjorie, et al.. (2003). Effectiveness of the ‘Mouth-feel Wheel’ for the evaluation of astringent subqualities in British Columbia red wines. Journal of Wine Research. 14(2-3). 67–78. 12 indexed citations
10.
Cliff, Margaret A., et al.. (2002). Use of Digital Images for Evaluation of Factors Responsible for Visual Preference of Apples by Consumers. HortScience. 37(7). 1127–1131. 32 indexed citations
11.
Cliff, Margaret A., D. Yuksel, Benôıt Girard, & Marjorie King. (2002). Characterization of Canadian Ice Wines by Sensory and Compositional Analyses. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 53(1). 46–53. 77 indexed citations
12.
Sholberg, P. L., et al.. (2001). Fumigation with acetic acid vapor to control decay of stored apples. Fruits. 56(5). 355–366. 19 indexed citations
13.
Douglas, D. R., et al.. (2001). Canadian terroir. Food Research International. 34(7). 559–563. 47 indexed citations
14.
Reynolds, Andrew G., Margaret A. Cliff, Benôıt Girard, & Thomas Kopp. (2001). Influence of Fermentation Temperature on Composition and Sensory Properties of Semillon and Shiraz Wines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 52(3). 235–240. 77 indexed citations
15.
Cliff, Margaret A., et al.. (2000). DEVELOPMENT OF A ‘BIPOLAR’ R‐INDEX1. Journal of Sensory Studies. 15(2). 219–229. 12 indexed citations
16.
Cliff, Margaret A., et al.. (2000). SENSORY AND PHYSIO‐CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF MEMBRANE FILTERED APPLE JUICES1. Journal of Food Quality. 23(2). 171–184. 7 indexed citations
17.
Cliff, Margaret A., et al.. (1998). Comparison of Mean Scores and R-indices for Consumer Preferences of Apple Cultivars. HortScience. 33(7). 1239–1240. 7 indexed citations
18.
Cliff, Margaret A. & Marjorie King. (1996). A proposed approach for evaluating expert wine judge performance using descriptive statistics. Journal of Wine Research. 7(2). 83–90. 22 indexed citations
19.
Dever, M.C., Margaret A. Cliff, & John W. Hall. (1995). Analysis of variation and multivariate relationships among analytical and sensory characteristics in whole apple evaluation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 69(3). 329–338. 34 indexed citations
20.
Cliff, Margaret A. & Hildegarde Heymann. (1991). PHYSICAL AND SENSORY CHARACTERISTICS OF CAT LITTER1. Journal of Sensory Studies. 6(4). 255–266. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026