Marjorie King

920 total citations
28 papers, 677 citations indexed

About

Marjorie King is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Marjorie King has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 677 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Food Science, 16 papers in Plant Science and 7 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management. Recurrent topics in Marjorie King's work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (17 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (14 papers) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (13 papers). Marjorie King is often cited by papers focused on Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (17 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (14 papers) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (13 papers). Marjorie King collaborates with scholars based in Canada, France and United States. Marjorie King's co-authors include Margaret A. Cliff, John W. Hall, Andrew G. Reynolds, Benôıt Girard, D. Yuksel, C.R. Hampson, Richard A. MacDonald, H. A. Quamme, Douglas A. Wardle and Pascal Delaquis and has published in prestigious journals such as Food Research International, Food Quality and Preference and Euphytica.

In The Last Decade

Marjorie King

27 papers receiving 612 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Marjorie King Canada 15 521 400 155 114 74 28 677
Gianluca Donadini Italy 18 592 1.1× 372 0.9× 199 1.3× 185 1.6× 64 0.9× 32 846
Karen M. Weller United States 14 377 0.7× 197 0.5× 62 0.4× 109 1.0× 74 1.0× 22 484
Richard A. Arnold United States 8 592 1.1× 337 0.8× 122 0.8× 129 1.1× 176 2.4× 12 737
Patricia Williamson Australia 10 422 0.8× 294 0.7× 189 1.2× 87 0.8× 95 1.3× 16 569
Debra Inglis Canada 15 633 1.2× 360 0.9× 82 0.5× 61 0.5× 183 2.5× 29 717
Soline Caillé France 10 435 0.8× 331 0.8× 98 0.6× 44 0.4× 153 2.1× 21 481
Belinda Kemp Canada 12 491 0.9× 378 0.9× 134 0.9× 25 0.2× 125 1.7× 35 553
Canan Nurgel Türkiye 11 491 0.9× 337 0.8× 76 0.5× 54 0.5× 167 2.3× 14 530
Ragnhild Solheim Sweden 11 472 0.9× 124 0.3× 35 0.2× 206 1.8× 68 0.9× 13 658
María Cristina Goldner Argentina 10 286 0.5× 150 0.4× 47 0.3× 100 0.9× 49 0.7× 16 329

Countries citing papers authored by Marjorie King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marjorie King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marjorie King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marjorie King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marjorie King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marjorie King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marjorie King. The network helps show where Marjorie King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marjorie King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marjorie King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marjorie King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marjorie King. Marjorie King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cliff, Margaret A., et al.. (2016). Influence of Wine Education on Wine Hedonic and Confidence Ratings by Millennial Wine Consumers of Different Ethnicities. Beverages. 2(4). 32–32. 8 indexed citations
2.
Cliff, Margaret A. & Marjorie King. (2009). Influence of Serving Temperature and Wine Type on Perception of Ethyl Acetate and 4-ethyl Phenol in Wine. Journal of Wine Research. 20(1). 45–52. 8 indexed citations
3.
King, Marjorie & Margaret A. Cliff. (2005). EVALUATION OF IDEAL WINE AND CHEESE PAIRS USING A DEVIATION‐FROM‐IDEAL SCALE WITH FOOD AND WINE EXPERTS. Journal of Food Quality. 28(3). 245–256. 43 indexed citations
4.
Reynolds, Andrew G., Douglas A. Wardle, Margaret A. Cliff, & Marjorie King. (2004). Impact of Training System and Vine Spacing on Vine Performance, Berry Composition, and Wine Sensory Attributes of Seyval and Chancellor. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 55(1). 84–95. 27 indexed citations
5.
Reynolds, Andrew G., Douglas A. Wardle, Margaret A. Cliff, & Marjorie King. (2004). Impact of Training System and Vine Spacing on Vine Performance, Berry Composition, and Wine Sensory Attributes of Riesling. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 55(1). 96–103. 24 indexed citations
6.
Reynolds, Andrew G., Margaret A. Cliff, Douglas A. Wardle, & Marjorie King. (2004). Evaluation of Winegrapes in British Columbia: `Chardonnay' and `Pinot noir' Clones. HortTechnology. 14(4). 594–602. 5 indexed citations
7.
Schlosser, James, et al.. (2004). Canadian terroir: sensory characterization of Chardonnay in the Niagara Peninsula. Food Research International. 38(1). 11–18. 25 indexed citations
8.
King, Marjorie, et al.. (2003). Effectiveness of the ‘Mouth-feel Wheel’ for the evaluation of astringent subqualities in British Columbia red wines. Journal of Wine Research. 14(2-3). 67–78. 12 indexed citations
9.
King, Marjorie & Margaret A. Cliff. (2002). Development of a Model for Prediction of ConsumerLiking from Visual Attributes of New and Established AppleCultivars. Journal of American Pomological Society. 56(4). 223–229.
10.
Cliff, Margaret A., D. Yuksel, Benôıt Girard, & Marjorie King. (2002). Characterization of Canadian Ice Wines by Sensory and Compositional Analyses. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 53(1). 46–53. 77 indexed citations
11.
Cliff, Margaret A., et al.. (2000). DEVELOPMENT OF A ‘BIPOLAR’ R‐INDEX1. Journal of Sensory Studies. 15(2). 219–229. 12 indexed citations
12.
Hampson, C.R., H. A. Quamme, John W. Hall, et al.. (2000). Sensory evaluation as a selection tool in apple breeding. Euphytica. 111(2). 79–90. 107 indexed citations
13.
Cliff, Margaret A., et al.. (2000). SENSORY AND PHYSIO‐CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF MEMBRANE FILTERED APPLE JUICES1. Journal of Food Quality. 23(2). 171–184. 7 indexed citations
14.
Cliff, Margaret A. & Marjorie King. (1999). Use of principal component analysis for the evaluation of judge performance at wine competitions. Journal of Wine Research. 10(1). 25–32. 20 indexed citations
15.
Cliff, Margaret A., et al.. (1998). Comparison of Mean Scores and R-indices for Consumer Preferences of Apple Cultivars. HortScience. 33(7). 1239–1240. 7 indexed citations
16.
Cliff, Margaret A., O.L. Lau, & Marjorie King. (1998). SENSORY CHARACTERISTICS OF CONTROLLED ATMOSPHERE‐ AND AIR‐STORED ‘GALA’ APPLES1. Journal of Food Quality. 21(3). 239–249. 14 indexed citations
17.
King, Marjorie, Margaret A. Cliff, & John W. Hall. (1998). COMPARISON OF PROJECTIVE MAPPING AND SORTING DATA COLLECTION AND MULTIVARIATE METHODOLOGIES FOR IDENTIFICATION OF SIMILARITY‐OF‐USE OF SNACK BARS1. Journal of Sensory Studies. 13(3). 347–358. 45 indexed citations
18.
Cliff, Margaret A., et al.. (1997). Evaluation of R-indices for preference testing of apple juices. Food Quality and Preference. 8(3). 241–246. 10 indexed citations
19.
Cliff, Margaret A. & Marjorie King. (1997). The evaluation of judges at wine competitions: the application of Eggshell plots. Journal of Wine Research. 8(2). 75–80. 18 indexed citations
20.
Cliff, Margaret A. & Marjorie King. (1996). A proposed approach for evaluating expert wine judge performance using descriptive statistics. Journal of Wine Research. 7(2). 83–90. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gianluca Donadini Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karen M. Weller Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Richard A. Arnold Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patricia Williamson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Debra Inglis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Soline Caillé Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Belinda Kemp Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Canan Nurgel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ragnhild Solheim Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by María Cristina Goldner
Rankless by CCL
2026