Lisa Pericola Case

929 citations
10 papers · 618 indexed · h-index 10
Topics
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (8 papers)Reading and Literacy Development (7 papers)Disability Education and Employment (2 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Lisa Pericola Case

10 papers receiving 518 citations

Peers

Lisa Pericola Case
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 518
  • Education 302
  • Statistics and Probability 235
  • Clinical Psychology 80
  • Safety Research 70
Replace Benjamin Silberglitt with:
Benjamin Silberglitt United States
Norris B. Phillips United States
Mary Beth Calhoon United States
Sheetal Sood United States
Kristen N. Missall United States
Melissa Romain United States
W. David Tilly United States
Anne F. Zaslofsky United States
Teri Wallace United States
Loulee Yen United States
Lisa Pericola Case relative to Benjamin Silberglitt United States Benjamin Silberglitt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Benjamin Silberglitt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Pericola Case

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Pericola Case's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Pericola Case with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Pericola Case more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Pericola Case

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Pericola Case. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Pericola Case. The network helps show where Lisa Pericola Case may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa Pericola Case

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa Pericola Case. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa Pericola Case based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa Pericola Case. Lisa Pericola Case is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 17
2 40
3 30
4 117
5 66
6 11
7 43
8 140
9 141
10
Self-Instructional Strategy Training: Improving the Mathematical Problem Solving Skills of Learning Disabled Students.
13

About Lisa Pericola Case

Lisa Pericola Case is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Education, having authored 10 papers that have together received 618 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (8 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (7 papers) and Disability Education and Employment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (518 citations), Statistics and Probability (235 citations) and Education (302 citations). Lisa Pericola Case has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Deborah L. Speece, Karen R. Harris, Steve Graham, Rebecca D. Silverman, Christopher Schatschneider, D. H. Cooper and Kristen D. Ritchey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Journal of Learning Disabilities and School Psychology Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026