D. H. Cooper

14 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers

D. H. Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 218
  • Education 132
  • Statistics and Probability 56
  • Clinical Psychology 25
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 24
Replace Christine McCormick with:
Christine McCormick United States
Catrina Liu Hong Kong
Keith T. Greaney New Zealand
Jane Fleming United States
Hanne Næss Hjetland Norway
Todd W. Busch United States
Sana Tibi United States
Matthew J. Davis United States
Joanne D. Meier United States
Sarah Herrera United States
D. H. Cooper relative to Christine McCormick United States Christine McCormick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Christine McCormick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. H. Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. H. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. H. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. H. Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. H. Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. H. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. H. Cooper. The network helps show where D. H. Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. H. Cooper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. H. Cooper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. H. Cooper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. H. Cooper. D. H. Cooper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 15
3 7
4
Deweyan Inquiry as a Means of Transforming the Culture of Family Involvement in a Title I Professional Development School
1
5 40
6 30
7 1
8 48
9 80
10 20
11
Maintaining at-risk children in regular education settings: initial effects of individual differences and classroom environments.
31
12 1
13
Adaptive behavior measures in mental retardation research: subject description in AJMD/AJMR articles (1979-1987).
4
14 18
15 1
16
An overview of the Botswana urban class structure and its articulation with the rural mode of production: Insights from Selebi-Phikwe
7

About D. H. Cooper

D. H. Cooper is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Education, having authored 16 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (218 citations), Statistics and Probability (56 citations) and Education (132 citations). D. H. Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Deborah L. Speece, Christopher Schatschneider, Froma P. Roth, Kristen D. Ritchey, Rebecca D. Silverman, Lisa Pericola Case, Joane Nagel, Chris Taylor, T.F. Cootes and J. Graham. Their work appears in journals such as American Educational Research Journal, Contemporary Educational Psychology and Journal of Learning Disabilities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026