Kelsey Inouye
- Education top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Lynn McAlpineDavid MillsIsabelle SkakniAnna Sala‐BubaréMontserrat CastellóPatricia KingoriSøren Smedegaard Ernst BengtsenMichelle K. McGinn
- Topics
- Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions (13 papers)Innovative Education and Learning Practices (3 papers)Higher Education Practises and Engagement (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Statistics, Probability and UncertaintyHuman Factors and ErgonomicsGeneral Health Professions
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwitzerlandCanada
In The Last Decade
Kelsey Inouye
19 papers receiving 353 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Education 160
- General Health Professions 142
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 57
- Political Science and International Relations 53
- Sociology and Political Science 42
Countries citing papers authored by Kelsey Inouye
This map shows the geographic impact of Kelsey Inouye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kelsey Inouye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kelsey Inouye more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kelsey Inouye
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kelsey Inouye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kelsey Inouye. The network helps show where Kelsey Inouye may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kelsey Inouye
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kelsey Inouye. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kelsey Inouye based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kelsey Inouye. Kelsey Inouye is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 45 | |
| 16 | 71 | |
| 17 | 56 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 41 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Kelsey Inouye
Kelsey Inouye is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, General Health Professions and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 22 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions (13 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (3 papers) and Higher Education Practises and Engagement (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (57 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (17 citations) and General Health Professions (142 citations). Kelsey Inouye has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lynn McAlpine, David Mills, Isabelle Skakni, Anna Sala‐Bubaré, Montserrat Castelló, Patricia Kingori, Søren Smedegaard Ernst Bengtsen, Michelle K. McGinn, Erika Löfstrôm and Gina Wisker. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Studies in Higher Education and Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.