Kelly Bruce
-
- Reading and Literacy Development 9
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies 3
- Educational and Psychological Assessments 3
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods 1
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills 4
- Education top 10%
- Writing and Handwriting Education 1
-
- Text Readability and Simplification 2
-
- Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation 1
- Co-authors
- John SabatiniTenaha O’ReillyLaura K. HaldermanJonathan SteinbergJonathan WeeksSarah H. EasonLaurie E. CuttingYigal Attali
- Journals
- Scientific Studies of Reading (1 paper)Learning Disabilities Research and Practice (1 paper)Reading Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Kelly Bruce
12 papers receiving 215 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 205
- Statistics and Probability 55
- Education 99
- Linguistics and Language 8
- Language and Linguistics 18
Countries citing papers authored by Kelly Bruce
This map shows the geographic impact of Kelly Bruce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kelly Bruce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kelly Bruce more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kelly Bruce
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kelly Bruce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kelly Bruce. The network helps show where Kelly Bruce may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Kelly Bruce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 2 | SARA Reading Components Tests, RISE Forms: Technical Adequacy and Test Design, 2nd Edition. Research Report. ETS RR-15-32. | 2015 | 7 |
| 3 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 4 | Using No-Stakes Educational Testing to Mitigate Summer Learning Loss: A Pilot Study. Research Report. ETS RR-14-21. | 2014 | 1 |
| 5 | 2014 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 49 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 12 | PIAAC Reading Component: A Conceptual Framework. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 33. | 2009 | 3 |
About Kelly Bruce
Kelly Bruce is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 12 papers that have together received 231 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (9 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (4 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (3 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers), Text Readability and Simplification (2 papers), Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (1 paper), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (1 paper) and Writing and Handwriting Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (205 citations), Statistics and Probability (55 citations) and Education (99 citations). Kelly Bruce has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John Sabatini, Tenaha O’Reilly, Laura K. Halderman, Jonathan Steinberg, Jonathan Weeks, Sarah H. Eason, Laurie E. Cutting, Yigal Attali, Franklin M. Zaromb and Rachel M. Adler. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Studies of Reading, Learning Disabilities Research and Practice and Reading Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.