This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn Ley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn Ley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn Ley more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn Ley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn Ley. The network helps show where Kathryn Ley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathryn Ley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathryn Ley.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathryn Ley based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kathryn Ley. Kathryn Ley is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ley, Kathryn, et al.. (2014). LEARNER-VALUED INTERACTIONS: Research into Practice. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 15(1). 23–32.4 indexed citations
Ley, Kathryn, et al.. (2008). Action Research: Effective Marketing Strategies for a Blended University Program. Online journal of distance learning administration. 11(2).1 indexed citations
Ley, Kathryn. (2006). Instructor Competencies: Standards for Face-to-Face, Online & Blended Settings (Rev. 3rd Ed.). The Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 7(2). 195.2 indexed citations
7.
Chang, Shujen L. & Kathryn Ley. (2006). A Learning Strategy to Compensate for Cognitive Overload in Online Learning: Learner Use of Printed Online Materials. 5(1). 104–117.31 indexed citations
8.
Ley, Kathryn, et al.. (2005). What's Driving Faculty Participation in Distance Education?. 2004(1).3 indexed citations
9.
Young, Dawn & Kathryn Ley. (2004). Effectiveness of POME Instructional Model. Research in the Teaching of Developmental Education. 21(1). 5.2 indexed citations
Young, Dawn & Kathryn Ley. (2003). Self-Regulation Support Offered by Developmental Educators. Journal of developmental education. 27(2). 2.12 indexed citations
12.
Ley, Kathryn & Caroline M. Crawford. (2002). Web, Web-Enhanced or 80/20: Choosing the Instructional Model that Makes Sense. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2002(1). 973–974.1 indexed citations
13.
Ley, Kathryn & Caroline M. Crawford. (2002). University Faculty Needs and Desires: Support Model During Web-Basing and Web-Enhancing Courses. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2002(1). 971–972.1 indexed citations
14.
Young, Dawn & Kathryn Ley. (2001). Mathematics Self-Efficacy Performance Discrepancies of Underprepared (Developmental) and Regular Admission College Students. Academic exchange quarterly. 5(2). 167.1 indexed citations
Ley, Kathryn & Dawn Young. (1998). Motivation in Developmental and Regular Admission Students.. Research in the Teaching of Developmental Education. 14(2). 29–36.10 indexed citations
17.
Young, Dawn & Kathryn Ley. (1997). Cognitive Style in Developmental and Regular Admission College Students.. Research in the Teaching of Developmental Education. 13(2). 45–54.2 indexed citations
18.
Young, Dawn & Kathryn Ley. (1997). Cognitive Skills in Developmental and Regularly Admitted College Students.. 2(2). 43–57.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.