Julia M. Jonas

788 total citations
23 papers, 549 citations indexed

About

Julia M. Jonas is a scholar working on Marketing, Management of Technology and Innovation and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia M. Jonas has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 549 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Marketing, 9 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Julia M. Jonas's work include Service and Product Innovation (15 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (7 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers). Julia M. Jonas is often cited by papers focused on Service and Product Innovation (15 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (7 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers). Julia M. Jonas collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Malaysia. Julia M. Jonas's co-authors include David Sörhammar, Lars Witell, Kaisa Koskela-Huotari, Bo Edvardsson, Angela Roth, Kathrin M. Moeslein, Kathrin M. Möslein, Matthew Alexander, Lorena Blasco‐Arcas and Tom Chen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Research, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and Journal of service management.

In The Last Decade

Julia M. Jonas

20 papers receiving 523 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julia M. Jonas Germany 10 353 161 156 140 110 23 549
Nausheen Syed Pakistan 13 112 0.3× 139 0.9× 105 0.7× 102 0.7× 95 0.9× 30 541
Carlos Alberto Gonçalves Brazil 12 67 0.2× 107 0.7× 60 0.4× 131 0.9× 44 0.4× 123 495
Hina Munir Pakistan 11 51 0.1× 105 0.7× 125 0.8× 38 0.3× 239 2.2× 37 554
Nima Heirati United Kingdom 13 203 0.6× 269 1.7× 180 1.2× 121 0.9× 88 0.8× 22 531
George C. Shen Taiwan 9 336 1.0× 201 1.2× 189 1.2× 292 2.1× 69 0.6× 11 706
Nicolas Zacharias Germany 12 189 0.5× 324 2.0× 209 1.3× 128 0.9× 156 1.4× 25 700
Michel van der Borgh Netherlands 13 166 0.5× 238 1.5× 194 1.2× 134 1.0× 129 1.2× 21 564
Jiawen Chen China 9 288 0.8× 228 1.4× 103 0.7× 195 1.4× 53 0.5× 19 561
Suraksha Gupta United Kingdom 10 242 0.7× 271 1.7× 153 1.0× 207 1.5× 64 0.6× 16 614
Pinar Cankurtaran Netherlands 4 169 0.5× 231 1.4× 93 0.6× 77 0.6× 84 0.8× 6 454

Countries citing papers authored by Julia M. Jonas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia M. Jonas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia M. Jonas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia M. Jonas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia M. Jonas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia M. Jonas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia M. Jonas. The network helps show where Julia M. Jonas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia M. Jonas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia M. Jonas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia M. Jonas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia M. Jonas. Julia M. Jonas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jonas, Julia M., et al.. (2022). Exploring data-driven service innovation—aligning perspectives in research and practice. Journal of Business Economics. 92(7). 1167–1205. 8 indexed citations
2.
Jonas, Julia M., et al.. (2021). Kollaboration mit Extended-Reality-Systemen – eine Kategorisierung. HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik. 59(1). 177–188.
3.
Jonas, Julia M., et al.. (2020). EXPLORING CUSTOMERS’ ACCEPTANCE OF AND RESISTANCE TO SERVICE ROBOTS IN STATIONARY RETAIL – A MIXED METHOD APPROACH. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 3 indexed citations
4.
Jonas, Julia M., et al.. (2020). Frontline Employees' Acceptance of and Resistance to Service Robots in Stationary Retail - An Exploratory Interview Study. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 4(1). 21–34. 38 indexed citations
5.
Jonas, Julia M., et al.. (2018). Tools for collaborating and interacting in living labs - an exploratory case study on JOSEPHS®. 298–310. 1 indexed citations
6.
Jonas, Julia M., et al.. (2018). Stakeholder engagement in intra- and inter-organizational innovation. Journal of service management. 29(3). 399–421. 58 indexed citations
7.
Roth, Angela, et al.. (2018). Value Propositions in Service Systems Enabled by Digital Technology: A Field Based Design Science Approach. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 2(4). 6–21. 3 indexed citations
8.
Christopeit, Maximilian, Gerald Wulf, Eva Wagner, et al.. (2018). Impact of ruxolitinib pretreatment on outcomes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis. European Journal Of Haematology. 101(3). 305–317. 34 indexed citations
9.
Matzner, Martin, Marion Büttgen, Haluk Demirkan, et al.. (2018). Digital Transformation in Service Management. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 2(2). 3–21. 41 indexed citations
10.
Rau, Christiane, et al.. (2017). Creating Competitive Advantage from Services: A Design Thinking Case Study from the Comnnodities Industry. Research-Technology Management. 60(3). 48. 2 indexed citations
11.
Roth, Angela & Julia M. Jonas. (2017). Stakeholder integration in service innovation - an exploratory case study in the healthcare industry. International Journal of Technology Management. 73(1/2/3). 91–91. 11 indexed citations
12.
Helkkula, Anu, et al.. (2017). Human-to-nonhuman value co-creation and resource integration: parasocial actors in a service ecosystem. 3 indexed citations
13.
Jonas, Julia M.. (2017). Stakeholder Integration in Service Innovation. 1 indexed citations
14.
Jonas, Julia M. & Angela Roth. (2017). Stakeholder integration in service innovation - an exploratory case study in the healthcare industry. International Journal of Technology Management. 73(1/2/3). 91–91. 15 indexed citations
15.
Rau, Christiane, et al.. (2017). Creating Competitive Advantage from Services. Research-Technology Management. 60(3). 48–56. 17 indexed citations
16.
Jonas, Julia M., Angela Roth, & Kathrin M. Möslein. (2016). Stakeholder Integration for Service Innovation in German Medium-Sized Enterprises. Service Science. 8(3). 320–332. 17 indexed citations
17.
Koskela-Huotari, Kaisa, Bo Edvardsson, Julia M. Jonas, David Sörhammar, & Lars Witell. (2016). Innovation in service ecosystems—Breaking, making, and maintaining institutionalized rules of resource integration. Journal of Business Research. 69(8). 2964–2971. 236 indexed citations
18.
Jonas, Julia M.. (2008). Metaphysischer – Physikalischer – Ästhetischer „Raum“. 2008(0). 169–181. 2 indexed citations
19.
Jonas, Julia M. & Stefan Eriksson. (2007). Sustainable Business at Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) : The Case of Coffee Queen AB. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 2 indexed citations
20.
Jonas, Julia M.. (2007). Service thinking = Service action? : Service thinking in a public transport network surrounding. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026