Research-Technology Management

2.0k papers and 31.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Research-Technology Management in the last decades have received a total of 31.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Research-Technology Management usually cover Strategy and Management (430 papers), Management of Technology and Innovation (236 papers) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (230 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (332 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (230 papers) and Innovation Policy and R&D (115 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Research-Technology Management are Robert G. Cooper, Henry Chesbrough, Elko J. Kleinschmidt, Scott J. Edgett, MaryAnne M. Gobble, Edward B. Roberts, Stephen K. Markham, Thomas M. Hout, George Stalk and Jim Euchner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Research-Technology Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Research-Technology Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Research-Technology Management.

Countries where authors publish in Research-Technology Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Research-Technology Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Research-Technology Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research-Technology Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025