Judith Gal‐Ezer

1.5k citations
85 papers · 979 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Judith Gal‐Ezer

79 papers receiving 903 citations

Peers

Judith Gal‐Ezer
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Computer Science Applications 777
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 333
  • Gender Studies 183
  • Media Technology 163
  • Software 37
Replace Amber Settle with:
Amber Settle United States
Eric Roberts United States
Michael Goldweber United States
Briana B. Morrison United States
Joyce Malyn‐Smith United States
Michal Armoni Israel
Thomas J. Cortina United States
Linda Mannila Sweden
Peter Hubwieser Germany
Henry M. Walker United States
Judith Gal‐Ezer relative to Amber Settle United States Amber Settle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Amber Settle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Judith Gal‐Ezer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Judith Gal‐Ezer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith Gal‐Ezer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith Gal‐Ezer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Judith Gal‐Ezer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith Gal‐Ezer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith Gal‐Ezer. The network helps show where Judith Gal‐Ezer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Judith Gal‐Ezer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Judith Gal‐Ezer Line = papers co-authored together Judith Gal‐Ezer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199595
2 199874
3 201474
4 199961
5 201057
6 200844
7 200341
8 201435
9 200435
10 200231
11 201028
12 202222
13 201419
14 200818
15 200717
16 200616
17 200015
18 200715
19 201913
20 200913

About Judith Gal‐Ezer

Judith Gal‐Ezer is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Media Technology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Information Systems and Education, having authored 85 papers that have together received 979 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (59 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (21 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (15 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (15 papers), Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development (11 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (9 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (5 papers) and Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (777 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (333 citations), Gender Studies (183 citations), Media Technology (163 citations) and Software (37 citations). Judith Gal‐Ezer has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Harel, Michal Armoni, Chris Stephenson, Orit Hazzan, Catriel Beeri, Lenore Blum, Noa Ragonis, Zippy Erlich, Mark Trakhtenbrot and Michael E. Caspersen. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Science Education, Computers & Education, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Communications of the ACM and Informatics in Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact