Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Experts' views on digital competence: Commonalities and differences
2013289 citationsJosé Janssen, Slavi Stoyanov et al.Computers & Educationprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of José Janssen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by José Janssen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites José Janssen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by José Janssen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by José Janssen. The network helps show where José Janssen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of José Janssen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of José Janssen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of José Janssen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with José Janssen. José Janssen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Janssen, José, et al.. (2019). TeSLA e-Assessment Model & Framework.2 indexed citations
5.
Janssen, José, et al.. (2015). Design and development of a cross-European employability training for older jobseekers. DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands). 7126–7133.1 indexed citations
Viegas, Clara, Arcelina Marques, Gustavo R. Alves, et al.. (2014). TRAILER. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals. 5(3). 1–17.5 indexed citations
Janssen, José, Slavi Stoyanov, Anusca Ferrari, et al.. (2013). Experts' views on digital competence: Commonalities and differences. Computers & Education. 68. 473–481.289 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
García‐Peñalvo, Francisco José, Alicia García‐Holgado, Miguel Á. Conde, et al.. (2012). TRAILER project overview: Tagging, recognition and acknowledgment of informal learning experiences. Open University of the Netherlands Research Portal. 1–6.25 indexed citations
12.
Janssen, José, Adriana Berlanga, & Peter Sloep. (2012). Implications of Identity Negotiation Research for the Design of the TRAILER e-Portfolio. DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands).3 indexed citations
13.
Janssen, José, Adriana Berlanga, & Rob Koper. (2011). Evaluation of the Learning Path Specification. Educational Technology & Society. 14(3). 218–230.14 indexed citations
14.
Janssen, José, Adriana Berlanga, Hubert Vogten, & Rob Koper. (2007). Towards a learning path specification. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning. 18(1). 77–77.34 indexed citations
15.
Tattersall, Colin, et al.. (2006). Swarm -based Sequencing Recommendations in E-learning.. DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands). 3. 1–11.4 indexed citations
Westera, Wim, Francis Brouns, Kees Pannekeet, José Janssen, & Jocelyn Manderveld. (2005). Achieving E-learning with IMS Learning Design - Workflow Implications at the Open University of the Netherlands. Educational Technology & Society. 8(3). 216–225.5 indexed citations
Janssen, José, et al.. (2001). 25 years outage data, ready for the future. 143–143.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.