Educational Research Review

1.3k papers and 57.2k indexed citations

About

The 1.3k papers published in Educational Research Review in the last decades have received a total of 57.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Educational Research Review usually cover Education (849 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (285 papers) and Social Psychology (156 papers) specifically the topics of Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (111 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (107 papers) and Education Practices and Challenges (98 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Educational Research Review are John T. E. Richardson, Filip Dochy, Anders Jönsson, Khe Foon Hew, Päivi Tynjälä, Murat Akçayır, Gökçe Akçayır, Ernesto Panadero, Jaclyn Broadbent and Annalisa Sannino.

In The Last Decade

Educational Research Review

1.2k papers receiving 52.6k citations

Countries where authors publish in Educational Research Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Educational Research Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Educational Research Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Educational Research Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Educational Research Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Educational Research Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Educational Research Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026