Jonathan Smith

69 papers receiving 465 citations

Peers

Jonathan Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Music 38
  • Social Psychology 135
  • Clinical Psychology 138
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 61
  • Education 118
Replace Nuran Hortaçsu with:
Nuran Hortaçsu Türkiye
Thomas W. Draper United States
George Belliveau Canada
Ai-Girl Tan Singapore
Robyn M. Holmes United States
Kristen M. Kemple United States
Luca Milani Italy
Shaun McNiff United States
Alison Jane Martingano United States
Rebecca S. New United States
Jonathan Smith relative to Nuran Hortaçsu Türkiye Nuran Hortaçsu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.3×
Nuran Hortaçsu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Smith. The network helps show where Jonathan Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Smith Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201755
2 202153
3 201749
4
Intertextuality and the media : from genre to everyday life
200043
5
Research Methods in Psychology: 3rd edition
200626
6 200524
7 202120
8 201619
9 202314
10 202113
11 202312
12 199510
13 20179
14 20208
15 20217
16 20227
17 20057
18 20207
19 20226
20 19966

About Jonathan Smith

Jonathan Smith is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and General Arts and Humanities, having authored 80 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (10 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (9 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (8 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (4 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (38 citations), Social Psychology (135 citations), Clinical Psychology (138 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (61 citations) and Education (118 citations). Jonathan Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ulrike Hanna Meinhof, Stéphanie Girard, Caroline Fitzpatrick, Julie Bergeron, Mathieu Gagnon, Ioannis Chatzis, Marios A. Ioannidis, Seán Hammond, Chris Fife‐Schaw and Glynis M. Breakwell. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Annals of Science, Italian Studies, Nineteenth-Century Literature and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026