Psychological Medicine

8.9k papers and 548.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.9k papers published in Psychological Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 548.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychological Medicine usually cover Clinical Psychology (3.7k papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (3.3k papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.8k papers) specifically the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (1.8k papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1.2k papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (991 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychological Medicine are Kenneth S. Kendler, David Goldberg, Ronald C. Kessler, Leonard R. Derogatis, Nick Melisaratos, Paul E. Garfinkel, Anthony F. Jorm, David M. Garner, V F Hillier and Jim van Os.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychological Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychological Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychological Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Psychological Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychological Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychological Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychological Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025