Annals of Science

1.6k papers and 8.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Annals of Science in the last decades have received a total of 8.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Annals of Science usually cover History and Philosophy of Science (740 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysics (267 papers) and Anthropology (169 papers) specifically the topics of History of Science and Natural History (299 papers), History of Science and Medicine (267 papers) and History and Developments in Astronomy (185 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Science are Trevor H. Levere, David Oldroyd, I. Grattan‐Guinness, G. L’E. Turner, Jon Agar, Steven Shapin, Michael Ruse, Helge Kragh, David Cahan and E. J. Aiton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annals of Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Science.

Countries where authors publish in Annals of Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025