Chris Fife‐Schaw
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Papers in
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 7
-
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 5
- Co-authors
- Glynis M. BreakwellGene RoweMark CropleySeán HammondDawn QuerstretPatrick SturgisTimothy SkinnerSarah E. Hampson
- Journals
- Clinical Rehabilitation (4 papers)Health Psychology (3 papers)Addiction (2 papers)Public Health (2 papers)Political Psychology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Chris Fife‐Schaw
80 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
- Applied Psychology 241
- Clinical Psychology 364
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 148
- Sociology and Political Science 586
- Marketing 116
Countries citing papers authored by Chris Fife‐Schaw
This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Fife‐Schaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Fife‐Schaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Fife‐Schaw more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Fife‐Schaw
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Fife‐Schaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Fife‐Schaw. The network helps show where Chris Fife‐Schaw may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chris Fife‐Schaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 67 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 7 | The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI): A good option to screen for anxiety in older people after stroke? | 2015 | 1 |
| 8 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 50 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 42 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 80 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 52 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 82 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 27 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1992 | 38 |
About Chris Fife‐Schaw
Chris Fife‐Schaw is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Rehabilitation, Communication, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, having authored 81 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (6 papers), Risk Perception and Management (6 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (5 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers) and Community Health and Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (241 citations), Clinical Psychology (364 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (148 citations), Sociology and Political Science (586 citations) and Marketing (116 citations). Chris Fife‐Schaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Glynis M. Breakwell, Gene Rowe, Mark Cropley, Seán Hammond, Dawn Querstret, Patrick Sturgis, Timothy Skinner, Sarah E. Hampson, Ian Kneebone and Helen Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Rehabilitation, Health Psychology, Addiction, Public Health and Political Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.