John R. Hinrichs

27 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers

John R. Hinrichs
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 180
  • Social Psychology 139
  • Applied Psychology 102
  • Sociology and Political Science 95
  • Management Science and Operations Research 69
Replace Paul F. Wernimont with:
Paul F. Wernimont United States
W. W. Ronan United States
Joseph Weitz United States
Paul W. Thayer United States
Kenneth M. Alvares United States
Edwin T. Cornelius United States
Leonard V. Gordon United States
Jeffery S. Schippmann United States
Jeffrey J. McHenry United States
John F. Binning United States
John R. Hinrichs relative to Paul F. Wernimont United States Paul F. Wernimont's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Paul F. Wernimont · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John R. Hinrichs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Hinrichs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Hinrichs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Hinrichs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Hinrichs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Hinrichs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Hinrichs. The network helps show where John R. Hinrichs may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John R. Hinrichs

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John R. Hinrichs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John R. Hinrichs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John R. Hinrichs. John R. Hinrichs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Developing human resources
19
2
Controlling absenteeism and turnover
3
3 4
4 20
5
Where Has All the Time Gone
0
6
A Feedback Program to Make Manager Development Happen.
1
7 22
8 29
9
The motivation crisis;: Winding down and turning off
3
10 20
11 9
12
Two Approaches to Filling the Management Gap: Management Selection vs. Management Development.
2
13 29
14 2
15 31
16 3
17 3
18
High-talent personnel; managing a critical resource
10
19 44
20 43

About John R. Hinrichs

John R. Hinrichs is a scholar working on General Psychology, Applied Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 30 papers that have together received 521 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (2 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (102 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (180 citations) and General Psychology (21 citations). John R. Hinrichs has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Arthur N. Turner, Paul R. Lawrence, Kenneth N. Wexley, Robert D. Gatewood, Douglas W. Bray, Benjamin Schneider, James Naylor, Robert E. Carlson and Edward E. Lawler. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Review, Journal of Applied Psychology and Annual Review of Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026