James Naylor

1.8k total citations
65 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

James Naylor is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, James Naylor has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Applied Psychology and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in James Naylor's work include Canadian Identity and History (11 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (3 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers). James Naylor is often cited by papers focused on Canadian Identity and History (11 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (3 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers). James Naylor collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. James Naylor's co-authors include George E. Briggs, Robert J. Wherry, Daniel R. Ilgen, Roger Clark, Matt Greig, Jerome R. Busemeyer, David Howell, Terry L. Dickinson, Michael Gauvreau and Nancy Christie and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Marketing Research and The American Historical Review.

In The Last Decade

James Naylor

56 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
James Naylor United States	22	230	229	203	193	185	65	1.3k
Gordon F. Pitz United States	20	168 0.7×	356 1.6×	519 2.6×	73 0.4×	198 1.1×	54	1.4k
Robert W. Lissitz United States	18	266 1.2×	530 2.3×	22 0.1×	266 1.4×	234 1.3×	61	2.0k
H. G. Osburn United States	20	202 0.9×	339 1.5×	21 0.1×	81 0.4×	138 0.7×	44	1.2k
Kent L. Norman United States	18	138 0.6×	53 0.2×	64 0.3×	143 0.7×	178 1.0×	72	1.1k
Balázs Aczél Hungary	16	182 0.8×	52 0.2×	142 0.7×	154 0.8×	173 0.9×	49	1.2k
Torsten Reimer United States	17	244 1.1×	109 0.5×	184 0.9×	138 0.7×	233 1.3×	53	960
Michael Schulte‐Mecklenbeck Switzerland	18	231 1.0×	103 0.4×	522 2.6×	70 0.4×	248 1.3×	36	1.6k
Daniel Mochon United States	15	304 1.3×	58 0.3×	237 1.2×	56 0.3×	491 2.7×	23	1.5k
Adriaan D. De Groot Netherlands	8	179 0.8×	57 0.2×	45 0.2×	367 1.9×	79 0.4×	12	1.1k
Jennifer Hedlund United States	13	771 3.4×	150 0.7×	41 0.2×	137 0.7×	220 1.2×	17	1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by James Naylor

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Naylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Naylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Naylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Naylor

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Naylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Naylor. The network helps show where James Naylor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Naylor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Naylor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Naylor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Naylor. James Naylor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Greig, Matt & James Naylor. (2017). THE EFFICACY OF ANGLE-MATCHED ISOKINETIC KNEE FLEXOR AND EXTENSOR STRENGTH PARAMETERS IN PREDICTING AGILITY TEST PERFORMANCE.. PubMed. 12(5). 728–736. 9 indexed citations

Greig, Matt & James Naylor. (2017). THE EFFICACY OF ANGLE-MATCHED ISOKINETIC KNEE FLEXOR AND EXTENSOR STRENGTH PARAMETERS IN PREDICTING AGILITY TEST PERFORMANCE. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 12(5). 728–736. 15 indexed citations

Naylor, James & Matt Greig. (2015). A hierarchical model of factors influencing a battery of agility tests.. PubMed. 55(11). 1329–35. 26 indexed citations

Naylor, James. (2013). The British Columbia CCF's Working-Class Moment: Socialism Not Populism. Labour / Le Travail. 71(1). 101–121.

Naylor, James. (2013). Socialism for a New Generation: ccf Youth in the Popular Front Era. Canadian Historical Review. 94(1). 55–79.

Naylor, James. (2009). Reasoning Otherwise: Leftists and the People’s Enlightenment in Canada, 1890–1920 (review). Canadian Historical Review. 90(4). 796–798. 1 indexed citations

Naylor, James. (2002). The Limits of Rural Capitalism: Family, Culture, and Markets in Montcalm, Manitoba, 1870–1940 by Kenneth Michael Sylvester (review). University of Toronto Quarterly. 72(1). 441–443. 2 indexed citations

Naylor, James. (1998). SPECIAL ARTICLE From Performance to Decision Processes in 33 Years: A History of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes under. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

Naylor, James. (1993). Workers and the State: Experiments in Corporatism after World War One. Studies in Political Economy. 42(1). 81–111.

10.

Naylor, James. (1991). The New Democracy. University of Toronto Press eBooks. 4 indexed citations

11.

Naylor, James & David Howell. (1986). British Workers and the Independent Labour Party, 1888-1906. Labour / Le Travail. 17. 328–328. 28 indexed citations

12.

Naylor, James & Daniel R. Ilgen. (1984). Goal setting: A theoretical analysis of a motivational technology.. 68 indexed citations

13.

Naylor, James & Robert M. Carroll. (1969). A test of the progression-regression hypotheses in a cognitive inference task. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 4(4). 337–352. 10 indexed citations

14.

Naylor, James, et al.. (1966). Characteristics of the human inference process in complex choice behavior situations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 1(1). 110–128. 119 indexed citations

15.

Naylor, James & George E. Briggs. (1965). Team-training effectiveness under various conditions.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 49(4). 223–229. 27 indexed citations

16.

Naylor, James & George E. Briggs. (1963). Effects of task complexity and task organization on the relative efficiency of part and whole training methods.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 65(3). 217–224. 147 indexed citations

17.

Naylor, James & George E. Briggs. (1963). Effect of rehearsal of temporal and spatial aspects on the long-term retention of a procedural skill.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 47(2). 120–126. 7 indexed citations

18.

Briggs, Jim, James Naylor, & Alexander Fuchs. (1962). WHOLE VERSUS PART TRAINING AS A FUNCTION OF TASK DIMENSIONS. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 2 indexed citations

19.

Naylor, James. (1962). Deceptive packaging: Are the deceivers being deceived?. Journal of Applied Psychology. 46(6). 393–398. 2 indexed citations

20.

Naylor, James, et al.. (1959). Predicting Female Absenteeism. Personnel Psychology. 12(1). 81–84. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact