Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A trophic state index for lakes1
19773.2k citationsRobert E. CarlsonLimnology and Oceanographyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Carlson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Carlson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Carlson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Carlson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Carlson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Carlson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Carlson. The network helps show where Robert E. Carlson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert E. Carlson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert E. Carlson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert E. Carlson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert E. Carlson. Robert E. Carlson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Carlson, Robert E. & Michele L. Anderson. (2011). Absorption properties of sulfuric acid in Venus's infrared spectral windows region. epsc. 2011. 1171.3 indexed citations
2.
Prisbell, Marshall, et al.. (2009). Connected Classroom Climate and Communication in the Basic Course: Associations with Learning. Basic communication course annual. 21(1). 11.22 indexed citations
3.
Bingham, Shereen G., Robert E. Carlson, Karen Kangas Dwyer, & Marshall Prisbell. (2009). Student Misbehaviors, Instructor Responses, And Connected Classroom Climate: Implications for the Basic Course. Basic communication course annual. 21(1). 7.22 indexed citations
4.
Carlson, Robert E., et al.. (2006). Connected Classroom Climate and Communication Apprehension: Correlations and Implications of the Basic Course. Basic communication course annual. 18(1). 6.13 indexed citations
Howett, Carly, P. G. J. Irwin, F. W. Taylor, & Robert E. Carlson. (2003). Infrared optical constants of ammonia ice. EGS - AGU - EUG Joint Assembly. 2234.1 indexed citations
7.
Dwyer, Karen Kangas, et al.. (2003). Impact of High School Preparation on College Oral Communication Apprehension. Basic communication course annual. 15(1). 9.1 indexed citations
8.
Dwyer, Karen Kangas, et al.. (2002). Communication Apprehension and Basic Course Success: The Lab-supported Public Speaking Course Intervention. Basic communication course annual. 14(1). 9.8 indexed citations
Harrison, Robert O. & Robert E. Carlson. (2000). Simplified sample preparation methods for rapid immunoassay analysis of PCDD/FS in foods. Organohalogen compounds. 45. 192–195.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.