This map shows the geographic impact of Jim Flowers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jim Flowers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jim Flowers more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jim Flowers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jim Flowers. The network helps show where Jim Flowers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jim Flowers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jim Flowers.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jim Flowers based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jim Flowers. Jim Flowers is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Flowers, Jim & Mary Annette Rose. (2020). Stereolithography Grows Experimenters.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 79(6). 15–18.1 indexed citations
2.
Flowers, Jim, et al.. (2015). 3D Printing: Exploring Capabilities.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 74(7). 17–21.1 indexed citations
3.
Flowers, Jim, et al.. (2015). Learning through Plastic Filament Extrusion.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 74(8). 22–25.
4.
Flowers, Jim, et al.. (2014). Keys to Succeeding in a Master's Program: Advice from Technology Education Graduate Advisors/Faculty.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 73(5). 34–39.2 indexed citations
5.
Flowers, Jim, et al.. (2014). An Experimental Approach To… Everything!.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 73(8). 8–12.2 indexed citations
6.
Flowers, Jim. (2014). Usability Engineering Can Change Our Thinking.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 74(2). 18–22.1 indexed citations
Flowers, Jim, et al.. (2006). Perceived Demand for Online and Hybrid Doctoral Programs in Technical Education.. ISU Red - Research and eData (Illinois State University). 43(4). 39–56.7 indexed citations
9.
Flowers, Jim. (2006). Curriculum, Methods, and Males: Problems and Solutions to Low Female Enrollment in College and Pre-College Technological Courses.1 indexed citations
Flowers, Jim, et al.. (2002). Rapid Prototyping in Technology Education: Rapid Prototyping, While Costly, Can Afford Students a Unique Opportunity to Bring Their Ideas to Reality. The technology teacher. 62(3). 7.2 indexed citations
12.
Wilson, Elizabeth, Barbara M. Kirby, & Jim Flowers. (2002). Factors Related to the Intent of Agricultural Educators To Adopt Integrated Agricultural Biotechnology Curriculum.. Journal of Agricultural Education. 43(1).4 indexed citations
13.
Flowers, Jim, et al.. (2002). Rapid Prototyping in Technology Education.. The technology teacher. 62(3). 7–11.14 indexed citations
14.
Flowers, Jim. (2001). The Value of Humor in Technology Education.. The technology teacher. 60(8). 10–13.16 indexed citations
15.
Flowers, Jim. (2000). 3D Laser Scanning in Technology Education.. The technology teacher. 60(3). 27–30.5 indexed citations
16.
Flowers, Jim. (2000). High Schools that Work and Tech Prep: Improving Student Performance in Basic Skills.. Korean Society for the Study of Vocational Education. 25(3).3 indexed citations
17.
Flowers, Jim. (1998). Teaching the Historical Perspective--Should We or Shouldn't We?.. The technology teacher. 57(4). 7–8.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.