Janet Schwartz
- General Decision Sciences top 2%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 13
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 10
- Marketing top 5%
- Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing 2
- Family Practice top 10%
-
- Economic and Environmental Valuation 5
- Healthcare Policy and Management 4
-
- Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare 3
-
- Social Media and Politics 2
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 2
- Co-authors
- Dan ArielyDaniel MochonGretchen B. ChapmanJason RiisBrian ElbelKaren JohnsonMary Frances LuceNoel T. Brewer
- Journals
- Management Science (1 paper)Journal of Marketing Research (2 papers)Journal of Consumer Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSingaporeUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Janet Schwartz
26 papers receiving 682 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- General Decision Sciences 132
- Applied Psychology 179
- Marketing 155
- Family Practice 24
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 156
Countries citing papers authored by Janet Schwartz
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Schwartz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Schwartz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Schwartz. The network helps show where Janet Schwartz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet Schwartz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 117 | |
| 8 | The Individual Dynamics of Online Reviews | 2014 | 1 |
| 9 | 2013 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 136 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 77 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 38 |
About Janet Schwartz
Janet Schwartz is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and Marketing, having authored 27 papers that have together received 743 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (13 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (2 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (132 citations), Applied Psychology (179 citations) and Marketing (155 citations). Janet Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dan Ariely, Daniel Mochon, Gretchen B. Chapman, Jason Riis, Brian Elbel, Karen Johnson, Mary Frances Luce, Noel T. Brewer, George Bergus and Deepak Patel. Their work appears in journals such as Management Science, Journal of Marketing Research and Journal of Consumer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.