Victoria A. Shaffer

2.2k total citations
65 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Victoria A. Shaffer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Victoria A. Shaffer has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in General Health Professions, 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 15 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Victoria A. Shaffer's work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (18 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 papers) and Media Influence and Health (9 papers). Victoria A. Shaffer is often cited by papers focused on Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (18 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 papers) and Media Influence and Health (9 papers). Victoria A. Shaffer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Victoria A. Shaffer's co-authors include Brian J. Zikmund‐Fisher, Hal R. Arkes, Laura D. Scherer, Mitchell A. Medow, Edgar C. Merkle, Scott A. Jeffrey, Hilary Bekker, Elizabeth S. Focella, Pete Wegier and Andrew Hathaway and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Medical Care and Health Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Victoria A. Shaffer

61 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Victoria A. Shaffer United States 22 535 278 237 166 166 65 1.5k
Holly A. Derry United States 16 729 1.4× 351 1.3× 210 0.9× 54 0.3× 164 1.0× 20 1.6k
Ketti Mazzocco Italy 25 545 1.0× 423 1.5× 335 1.4× 218 1.3× 291 1.8× 113 2.8k
Rita Kukafka United States 23 910 1.7× 298 1.1× 296 1.2× 62 0.4× 146 0.9× 113 2.2k
Laura D. Scherer United States 29 925 1.7× 683 2.5× 405 1.7× 392 2.4× 367 2.2× 116 3.0k
Aaron M. Scherer United States 19 294 0.5× 338 1.2× 132 0.6× 91 0.5× 170 1.0× 82 1.3k
Amanda J. Dillard United States 21 348 0.7× 400 1.4× 140 0.6× 244 1.5× 62 0.4× 38 1.6k
Gordon Kraft‐Todd United States 17 436 0.8× 740 2.7× 249 1.1× 303 1.8× 118 0.7× 35 2.0k
Pamela Williams-Piehota United States 22 737 1.4× 250 0.9× 534 2.3× 135 0.8× 149 0.9× 72 1.8k
Talya Miron‐Shatz Israel 19 557 1.0× 221 0.8× 242 1.0× 136 0.8× 109 0.7× 65 1.6k
Judith Covey United Kingdom 22 329 0.6× 337 1.2× 132 0.6× 131 0.8× 574 3.5× 58 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Victoria A. Shaffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Victoria A. Shaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Victoria A. Shaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Victoria A. Shaffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Victoria A. Shaffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Victoria A. Shaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Victoria A. Shaffer. The network helps show where Victoria A. Shaffer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Victoria A. Shaffer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Victoria A. Shaffer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Victoria A. Shaffer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Victoria A. Shaffer. Victoria A. Shaffer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McCrimmon, Tara, Lauren F. Collins, Amaya Perez‐Brumer, et al.. (2024). Long-Acting Injectable Antiretrovirals for HIV Treatment: A Multi-Site Qualitative Study of Clinic-Level Barriers to Implementation in the United States. AIDS Patient Care and STDs. 38(2). 61–69. 11 indexed citations
3.
Philbin, Morgan M., Tara McCrimmon, Victoria A. Shaffer, et al.. (2022). A Patient Decision Aid (i.ARTs) to Facilitate Women’s Choice Between Oral and Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Treatment for HIV: Protocols for its Development and Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. JMIR Research Protocols. 11(9). e35646–e35646. 10 indexed citations
4.
Wegier, Pete, Jeffery L. Belden, Shannon M. Canfield, et al.. (2021). Home blood pressure data visualization for the management of hypertension: using human factors and design principles. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 21(1). 235–235. 10 indexed citations
5.
Shaffer, Victoria A., Pete Wegier, Jeffery L. Belden, et al.. (2020). Use of Enhanced Data Visualization to Improve Patient Judgments about Hypertension Control. Medical Decision Making. 40(6). 785–796. 6 indexed citations
7.
Shaffer, Victoria A., et al.. (2019). Encouraging perspective taking: Using narrative writing to induce empathy for others engaging in negative health behaviors. PLoS ONE. 14(10). e0224046–e0224046. 30 indexed citations
9.
Shaffer, Victoria A., Pete Wegier, Jeffery L. Belden, et al.. (2018). Patient Judgments About Hypertension Control: The Role of Variability, Trends, and Outliers in Visualized Blood Pressure Data. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 21(3). e11366–e11366. 10 indexed citations
10.
Shaffer, Victoria A. & Laura D. Scherer. (2018). Too Much Medicine: Behavioral Science Insights on Overutilization, Overdiagnosis, and Overtreatment in Health Care. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 5(2). 155–162. 11 indexed citations
11.
Scherer, Laura D., Victoria A. Shaffer, Tanner Caverly, et al.. (2017). The role of the affect heuristic and cancer anxiety in responding to negative information about medical tests. Psychology and Health. 33(2). 292–312. 11 indexed citations
12.
Shaffer, Victoria A.. (2017). Nudges for Health Policy: Effectiveness and Limitations. Missouri law review. 82(3). 11. 3 indexed citations
13.
Jain, Akshay, Mihail Popescu, James M. Keller, et al.. (2017). A decision support system for home BP measurements. 2 indexed citations
14.
Shaffer, Victoria A., Elizabeth S. Focella, Laura D. Scherer, & Brian J. Zikmund‐Fisher. (2016). Debiasing affective forecasting errors with targeted, but not representative, experience narratives. Patient Education and Counseling. 99(10). 1611–1619. 20 indexed citations
15.
Bekker, Hilary, Anna Winterbottom, Phyllis Butow, et al.. (2013). Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective? A critical review of theory and evidence. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 13(S2). S9–S9. 139 indexed citations
16.
Shaffer, Victoria A., et al.. (2013). The effect of defaults in an electronic health record on laboratory test ordering practices for pediatric patients.. Health Psychology. 32(9). 995–1002. 29 indexed citations
17.
Shaffer, Victoria A., et al.. (2013). The Effect of Narrative Information in a Publicly Available Patient Decision Aid for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Health Communication. 29(1). 64–73. 23 indexed citations
18.
Shaffer, Victoria A., et al.. (2012). Why Do Patients Derogate Physicians Who Use a Computer-Based Diagnostic Support System?. Medical Decision Making. 33(1). 108–118. 84 indexed citations
19.
Shaffer, Victoria A., et al.. (2009). Are within-subjects designs transparent?. Judgment and Decision Making. 4(7). 544–566. 21 indexed citations
20.
Shaffer, Victoria A., et al.. (2009). Are patient decision aids effective? Insight from revisiting the debate between correspondence and coherence theories of judgment. Judgment and Decision Making. 4(2). 141–146. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026