Helena Szrek
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- General Decision Sciences top 2%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Li‐Wei ChaoNuno Sousa PereiraMark V. PaulyShandir RamlaganKarl PeltzerM. Kate BundorfJonathan BaronCatherine Cross
- Topics
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (7 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers)Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- PortugalUnited StatesSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Helena Szrek
22 papers receiving 512 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Economics and Econometrics 164
- General Decision Sciences 157
- General Health Professions 117
- Applied Psychology 98
- Sociology and Political Science 81
Countries citing papers authored by Helena Szrek
This map shows the geographic impact of Helena Szrek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helena Szrek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helena Szrek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Helena Szrek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helena Szrek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helena Szrek. The network helps show where Helena Szrek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helena Szrek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helena Szrek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helena Szrek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helena Szrek. Helena Szrek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 80 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 78 | |
| 17 | Time preference and its relationship with age, health, and survival probability. | 82 |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 28 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Helena Szrek
Helena Szrek is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (7 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (157 citations), Applied Psychology (98 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (25 citations). Helena Szrek has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Li‐Wei Chao, Nuno Sousa Pereira, Mark V. Pauly, Shandir Ramlagan, Karl Peltzer, M. Kate Bundorf, Jonathan Baron, Catherine Cross, Jeff Gow and Lara Noronha Ferreira. Their work appears in journals such as Health Psychology, Health Affairs and Journal of Development Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.