James M. Munch

1.1k total citations
26 papers, 852 citations indexed

About

James M. Munch is a scholar working on Marketing, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, James M. Munch has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 852 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Marketing, 10 papers in Social Psychology and 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in James M. Munch's work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (15 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (8 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (4 papers). James M. Munch is often cited by papers focused on Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (15 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (8 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (4 papers). James M. Munch collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Latvia. James M. Munch's co-authors include John L. Swasy, Mark Toncar, Gary Gregory, John H. Antil, Mark A. Pavelchak, Karin Braunsberger, Mark Peterson, Hieu P. Nguyen, Lee C. Simmons and Clifford C. Clogg and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Business Research and Journal of Advertising.

In The Last Decade

James M. Munch

25 papers receiving 727 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James M. Munch United States 15 505 382 174 172 168 26 852
Yih Hwai Lee Singapore 13 753 1.5× 484 1.3× 174 1.0× 264 1.5× 122 0.7× 23 1.1k
G. Douglas Olsen Canada 13 829 1.6× 441 1.2× 155 0.9× 278 1.6× 92 0.5× 19 1.1k
Jasmina Ilicic Australia 20 745 1.5× 734 1.9× 137 0.8× 141 0.8× 149 0.9× 49 1.1k
Prashant Malaviya United States 15 585 1.2× 517 1.4× 121 0.7× 122 0.7× 119 0.7× 20 930
Mark A. Pavelchak United States 8 334 0.7× 419 1.1× 227 1.3× 125 0.7× 105 0.6× 11 835
David B. Wooten United States 12 530 1.0× 546 1.4× 178 1.0× 166 1.0× 57 0.3× 27 923
Anne M. Brumbaugh United States 15 605 1.2× 449 1.2× 165 0.9× 175 1.0× 60 0.4× 18 995
Marina Puzakova United States 16 740 1.5× 564 1.5× 223 1.3× 152 0.9× 133 0.8× 26 1.1k
Kathleen Debevec United States 13 402 0.8× 309 0.8× 98 0.6× 73 0.4× 86 0.5× 23 713
Dan Padgett United States 8 462 0.9× 326 0.9× 81 0.5× 207 1.2× 105 0.6× 14 753

Countries citing papers authored by James M. Munch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Munch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Munch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Munch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Munch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Munch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Munch. The network helps show where James M. Munch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. Munch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. Munch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. Munch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James M. Munch. James M. Munch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Geiger‐Oneto, Stephanie, Hieu P. Nguyen, & James M. Munch. (2022). An empirical investigation of regional differences in consumption behaviors in an emerging economy. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 22(1). 27–42. 3 indexed citations
2.
Nguyen, Hieu P. & James M. Munch. (2014). The moderating role of gift recipients' attachment orientations on givers' gift‐giving perceptions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 13(5). 373–382. 9 indexed citations
3.
Nguyen, Hieu P., James M. Munch, & Meryl P. Gardner. (2014). Does Repeated AD Exposure Impair or Facilitate Recall of ADS with Similar Affective Valence? An Exploratory Study. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 22(1). 25–40. 1 indexed citations
4.
Munch, James M., et al.. (2012). The Influence of Situational Variables on Brand Personality Choice. International Journal of Marketing Studies. 4(6). 2 indexed citations
5.
Natarajan, Vivek S., Gurumurthy Kalyanaram, & James M. Munch. (2010). Asymmetric Market Reaction to New Product Announcements: An Exploratory Study. Academy of Marketing Studies journal. 14(2). 1. 1 indexed citations
6.
Nguyen, Hieu P. & James M. Munch. (2010). Romantic gift giving as chore or pleasure: The effects of attachment orientations on gift giving perceptions. Journal of Business Research. 64(2). 113–118. 27 indexed citations
7.
Toncar, Mark & James M. Munch. (2010). Meaningful Replication: When is A Replication no Longer A Replication? A Rejoinder to Stella and Adam (2008). The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 18(1). 71–80. 27 indexed citations
8.
Peterson, Mark, Gary Gregory, & James M. Munch. (2005). Comparing US and European perspectives on B2B repair service quality for mission‐critical equipment. International Marketing Review. 22(3). 353–368. 15 indexed citations
9.
Toncar, Mark & James M. Munch. (2003). The Influence of Simple and Complex Tropes on Believability, Importance and Memory. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 11(4). 39–53. 20 indexed citations
10.
Toncar, Mark & James M. Munch. (2001). Consumer Responses to Tropes in Print Advertising. Journal of Advertising. 30(1). 55–65. 119 indexed citations
11.
Gregory, Gary & James M. Munch. (1996). Reconceptualizing Individualism-Collectivism in Consumer Behavior. ACR North American Advances. 15 indexed citations
12.
Simmons, Lee C. & James M. Munch. (1996). Is Relationship Marketing Culturally Bound: a Look At Guanxi in China. ACR North American Advances. 22 indexed citations
13.
Toncar, Mark, James M. Munch, & Michael Y. Hu. (1994). Examining Consumers’ Thoughts during a Telemarketing Message. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 2(3). 46–56. 1 indexed citations
14.
Munch, James M., et al.. (1993). The Effects of Argument Structure and Affective Tagging on Product Attitude Formation. Journal of Consumer Research. 20(2). 294–294. 42 indexed citations
15.
Swasy, John L., et al.. (1990). Conceptualizing Argument Quality Via Argument Structure. ACR North American Advances. 18 indexed citations
16.
Munch, James M. & John L. Swasy. (1988). Rhetorical Question, Summarization Frequency, and Argument Strength Effects on Recall. Journal of Consumer Research. 15(1). 69–69. 62 indexed citations
17.
Pavelchak, Mark A., John H. Antil, & James M. Munch. (1988). The Super Bowl: An Investigation into the Relationship Among Program Context, Emotional Experience, and Ad Recall. Journal of Consumer Research. 15(3). 360–360. 156 indexed citations
18.
Swasy, John L. & James M. Munch. (1985). Examining the Target of Receiver Elaborations: Rhetorical Question Effects on Source Processing and Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research. 11(4). 877–877. 72 indexed citations
19.
Clogg, Clifford C. & James M. Munch. (1984). Using simultaneous latent structure models to analyze group differences: Exploratory analysis of buying style items. Journal of Business Research. 12(3). 319–336. 9 indexed citations
20.
Munch, James M. & John L. Swasy. (1983). A Conceptual View of Questions and Questioning in Marketing Communications. ACR North American Advances. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026