Hock‐Peng Sin

2.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
16 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Hock‐Peng Sin is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Hock‐Peng Sin has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 5 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Hock‐Peng Sin's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers) and Community Health and Development (2 papers). Hock‐Peng Sin is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers) and Community Health and Development (2 papers). Hock‐Peng Sin collaborates with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Australia. Hock‐Peng Sin's co-authors include Alicia A. Grandey, David N. Dickter, David V. Day, Donald E. Conlon, Kelly Schwind Wilson, Maw‐Der Foo, Joel Koopman, Michael J. A. Howe, John R. Hollenbeck and Sibel Özgen and has published in prestigious journals such as Academy of Management Review, Strategic Management Journal and Journal of Applied Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Hock‐Peng Sin

16 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Hit Papers

The customer is not always right: customer aggression and... 2004 2026 2011 2018 2004 200 400 600
What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

  1. The customer is not always right: customer aggression and emotion regulation of service employees
    2004 709 citations Alicia A. Grandey, David N. Dickter et al. Journal of Organizational Behavior profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hock‐Peng Sin United States 11 1.0k 727 529 176 150 16 1.7k
Shannon G. Taylor United States 23 854 0.8× 655 0.9× 467 0.9× 240 1.4× 184 1.2× 45 1.7k
Karlheinz Sonntag Germany 18 999 1.0× 705 1.0× 504 1.0× 273 1.6× 132 0.9× 76 1.7k
Sonja Rispens Netherlands 17 705 0.7× 607 0.8× 548 1.0× 159 0.9× 106 0.7× 50 1.4k
Craig D. Crossley United States 12 1.2k 1.1× 566 0.8× 642 1.2× 279 1.6× 161 1.1× 15 2.0k
Karen K. Myers United States 20 669 0.6× 670 0.9× 501 0.9× 159 0.9× 92 0.6× 37 1.7k
Jixia Yang Hong Kong 15 1.3k 1.2× 756 1.0× 664 1.3× 148 0.8× 157 1.0× 22 1.9k
Jennifer S. Tucker United States 12 848 0.8× 451 0.6× 412 0.8× 172 1.0× 147 1.0× 16 1.5k
Sherry E. Moss United States 21 1.1k 1.0× 770 1.1× 622 1.2× 160 0.9× 172 1.1× 38 1.8k
Ryan M. Vogel United States 15 1.0k 1.0× 551 0.8× 576 1.1× 171 1.0× 203 1.4× 21 1.7k
Eugene Kim United States 13 618 0.6× 481 0.7× 441 0.8× 135 0.8× 133 0.9× 24 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Hock‐Peng Sin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hock‐Peng Sin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hock‐Peng Sin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hock‐Peng Sin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hock‐Peng Sin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hock‐Peng Sin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hock‐Peng Sin. The network helps show where Hock‐Peng Sin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hock‐Peng Sin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hock‐Peng Sin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hock‐Peng Sin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hock‐Peng Sin. Hock‐Peng Sin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Wang, Chen, et al.. (2024). A Purposeful Approach to LMX Differentiation: The Role of LMX With Key Members. Group & Organization Management. 49(2). 299–331. 1 indexed citations
2.
Sánchez, Juan I., et al.. (2023). Assessing Common-Metric Effect Sizes to Refine Mediation Models. Organizational Research Methods. 27(3). 351–368. 4 indexed citations
3.
Zhou, Yuyang, Chen Wang, & Hock‐Peng Sin. (2022). Being “there and aware”: a meta-analysis of the literature on leader mindfulness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 32(3). 299–316. 14 indexed citations
4.
Hiller, Nathan J., et al.. (2018). Benevolence and authority as WEIRDly unfamiliar: A multi-language meta-analysis of paternalistic leadership behaviors from 152 studies. The Leadership Quarterly. 30(1). 165–184. 99 indexed citations
5.
Spitzmüller, Matthias, et al.. (2015). Investigating the Uniqueness and Usefulness of Proactive Personality in Organizational Research: A Meta-Analytic Review. Human Performance. 28(4). 351–379. 84 indexed citations
6.
Koopman, Joel, Michael J. A. Howe, John R. Hollenbeck, & Hock‐Peng Sin. (2014). Small sample mediation testing: Misplaced confidence in bootstrapped confidence intervals.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 100(1). 194–202. 142 indexed citations
7.
Day, David V. & Hock‐Peng Sin. (2011). Longitudinal tests of an integrative model of leader development: Charting and understanding developmental trajectories. The Leadership Quarterly. 22(3). 545–560. 165 indexed citations
8.
Wilson, Kelly Schwind, Hock‐Peng Sin, & Donald E. Conlon. (2010). What About the Leader in Leader-Member Exchange? The Impact of Resource Exchanges and Substitutability on the Leader. Academy of Management Review. 35(3). 358–372. 29 indexed citations
9.
Wilson, Kelly Schwind, Hock‐Peng Sin, & Donald E. Conlon. (2010). WHAT ABOUT THE LEADER IN LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE? THE IMPACT OF RESOURCE EXCHANGES AND SUBSTITUTABILITY ON THE LEADER.. Academy of Management Review. 35(3). 358–372. 184 indexed citations
10.
Day, David V. & Hock‐Peng Sin. (2009). LEADER DEVELOPMENT, IDENTITY, AND GOAL ORIENTATION: A STUDY OF PERSONAL CHANGE TRAJECTORIES.. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2009(1). 1–6. 3 indexed citations
11.
Sin, Hock‐Peng, Jennifer D. Nahrgang, & Frederick P. Morgeson. (2009). RESEARCH REPORTS Understanding Why They Don't See Eye to Eye: An Examination of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Agreement. 17 indexed citations
12.
Foo, Maw‐Der, et al.. (2006). Effects of team inputs and intrateam processes on perceptions of team viability and member satisfaction in nascent ventures. Strategic Management Journal. 27(4). 389–399. 135 indexed citations
13.
Sin, Hock‐Peng. (2006). A LONGITUDINAL STUDY ON THE INTERPERSONAL DYNAMICS OF LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE DEVELOPMENT. 3 indexed citations
14.
Sin, Hock‐Peng & Ramadhar Singh. (2005). Age and outcome allocation: A new test of the subtractive model. Asian Journal Of Social Psychology. 8(3). 211–223. 2 indexed citations
15.
Day, David V., et al.. (2004). Assessing the Burdens of Leadership: Effects of Formal Leadership Roles on Individual Performance Over Time. Personnel Psychology. 57(3). 573–605. 74 indexed citations
16.
Grandey, Alicia A., David N. Dickter, & Hock‐Peng Sin. (2004). The customer is not always right: customer aggression and emotion regulation of service employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 25(3). 397–418. 709 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shannon G. Taylor Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karlheinz Sonntag Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sonja Rispens Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Craig D. Crossley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karen K. Myers Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jixia Yang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer S. Tucker Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sherry E. Moss Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ryan M. Vogel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eugene Kim
Rankless by CCL
2026