He Ding

738 citations
49 papers · 556 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

He Ding

45 papers receiving 532 citations

Peers

He Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 388
  • Social Psychology 271
  • Demography 124
  • Applied Psychology 33
  • Communication 42
Replace Ismael Diaz with:
Ismael Diaz United States
Danni Wang China
Jianghua Mao China
Zhengxue Luo China
Melissa Chamberlin United States
Dong Ju China
Jian An Zhong China
David A. Richards Canada
Stijn Decoster Belgium
Andrew Marty Australia
He Ding relative to Ismael Diaz United States Ismael Diaz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Ismael Diaz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by He Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of He Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by He Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites He Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by He Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by He Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by He Ding. The network helps show where He Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside He Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with He Ding Line = papers co-authored together He Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202068
2 201955
3 202037
4 202031
5 202030
6 202028
7 202025
8 202024
9 202123
10 202019
11 202018
12 202115
13 202015
14 202013
15 202213
16 202013
17 202112
18 202210
19 202110
20 20228

About He Ding

He Ding is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Demography, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 49 papers that have together received 556 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (43 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (25 papers), Workplace Spirituality and Leadership (14 papers), Workaholism, burnout, and well-being (8 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (6 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (5 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (388 citations), Social Psychology (271 citations), Demography (124 citations), Applied Psychology (33 citations) and Communication (42 citations). He Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Enhai Yu, Yanbin Li, Weilin Su, Enhai Yu, Jun Liu, Jun Liu, Jun Liu, ZIQING zhou, Feng Liu and Charles Martin‐Krumm. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Career Development, Personnel Review, Leadership & Organization Development Journal and Personality and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact