Stephen A. Dwight

961 total citations
18 papers, 683 citations indexed

About

Stephen A. Dwight is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen A. Dwight has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 683 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Stephen A. Dwight's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers) and Personality Traits and Psychology (4 papers). Stephen A. Dwight is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers) and Personality Traits and Psychology (4 papers). Stephen A. Dwight collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Stephen A. Dwight's co-authors include John J. Donovan, George M. Alliger, Gregory M. Hurtz, Dan Schneider, Jason J. Dahling, Samantha Le Chau, Fabio Della Sala, Larry K. Brown, Nora Reilly and Paul Davis and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Personnel Psychology and Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Stephen A. Dwight

17 papers receiving 623 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stephen A. Dwight United States	10	321	254	248	202	124	18	683
Mary D. Stecher United States	7	304 0.9×	210 0.8×	208 0.8×	178 0.9×	70 0.6×	8	579
Patrick H. Raymark United States	13	212 0.7×	202 0.8×	228 0.9×	254 1.3×	62 0.5×	21	658
Nicole M. Dudley United States	6	253 0.8×	148 0.6×	252 1.0×	298 1.5×	72 0.6×	8	632
Patrick D. Converse United States	14	187 0.6×	222 0.9×	202 0.8×	175 0.9×	153 1.2×	39	698
Robert A. Levin United States	8	283 0.9×	188 0.7×	170 0.7×	93 0.5×	59 0.5×	17	480
Newell K. Eaton United States	6	409 1.3×	202 0.8×	303 1.2×	240 1.2×	99 0.8×	12	748
Richard Hermida United States	7	172 0.5×	224 0.9×	262 1.1×	346 1.7×	84 0.7×	13	798
Janice L. Miller United States	7	303 0.9×	200 0.8×	187 0.8×	171 0.8×	60 0.5×	8	515
Deanna Messervey Canada	7	200 0.6×	253 1.0×	245 1.0×	90 0.4×	91 0.7×	11	754
Jeffrey M. Cucina United States	13	200 0.6×	112 0.4×	131 0.5×	125 0.6×	56 0.5×	30	510

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen A. Dwight

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen A. Dwight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen A. Dwight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen A. Dwight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen A. Dwight

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen A. Dwight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen A. Dwight. The network helps show where Stephen A. Dwight may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen A. Dwight

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen A. Dwight. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen A. Dwight based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen A. Dwight. Stephen A. Dwight is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

1.

Donovan, John J., Steven J. Lorenzet, Stephen A. Dwight, & Dan Schneider. (2018). The impact of goal progress and individual differences on self‐regulation in training. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 48(12). 661–674. 4 indexed citations

2.

Dahling, Jason J., et al.. (2015). Does Coaching Matter? A Multilevel Model Linking Managerial Coaching Skill and Frequency to Sales Goal Attainment. Personnel Psychology. 69(4). 863–894. 82 indexed citations

3.

Donovan, John J., Stephen A. Dwight, & Dan Schneider. (2013). The Impact of Applicant Faking on Selection Measures, Hiring Decisions, and Employee Performance. Journal of Business and Psychology. 29(3). 479–493. 82 indexed citations

4.

Chau, Samantha Le & Stephen A. Dwight. (2011). Identified Surveys Are Critical for Making Strategic HR Decisions. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 4(4). 460–461. 1 indexed citations

5.

Donovan, John J., Stephen A. Dwight, & Gregory M. Hurtz. (2003). An Assessment of the Prevalence, Severity, and Verifiability of Entry-Level Applicant Faking Using the Randomized Response Technique. Human Performance. 16(1). 81–106. 135 indexed citations

6.

Dwight, Stephen A. & John J. Donovan. (2003). Do Warnings Not to Fake Reduce Faking?. Human Performance. 16(1). 1–23. 120 indexed citations

7.

Sala, Fabio Della & Stephen A. Dwight. (2002). Predicting executive performance with multirater surveys: Whom you ask makes a difference.. Consulting psychology journal. 54(3). 166–172. 29 indexed citations

8.

Sala, Fabio Della & Stephen A. Dwight. (2002). Predicting executive performance with multirater surveys: Whom you ask makes a difference.. Consulting psychology journal. 54(3). 166–172. 1 indexed citations

9.

Dwight, Stephen A., et al.. (2002). Metatraits: Enhancing Criterion‐Related Validity Through the Assessment of Traitedness¹. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 32(10). 2202–2212. 9 indexed citations

10.

Dwight, Stephen A., et al.. (2000). Can asking questions by computer improve the candidness of responding? A meta-analytic perspective.. Consulting psychology journal. 52(4). 248–255. 36 indexed citations

11.

Alliger, George M. & Stephen A. Dwight. (2000). A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Susceptibility of Integrity Tests to Faking and Coaching. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 60(1). 59–72. 84 indexed citations

12.

Dwight, Stephen A., et al.. (2000). A Quantitative Review of the Effect of Computerized Testing on the Measurement of Social Desirability. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 60(3). 340–360. 46 indexed citations

13.

Dwight, Stephen A., et al.. (2000). Can asking questions by computer improve the candidness of responding? A meta-analytic perspective.. Consulting psychology journal. 52(4). 248–255. 2 indexed citations

14.

Dwight, Stephen A., et al.. (1998). Comparison of Criterion-Related Validity Coefficients for the Mini-Markers and Goldberg's Markers of the Big Five Personality Factors. Journal of Personality Assessment. 70(3). 541–550. 30 indexed citations

15.

Dwight, Stephen A. & George M. Alliger. (1997). Reactions to Overt Integrity Test Items. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 57(6). 937–948. 14 indexed citations

16.

Aamodt, Michael G., et al.. (1997). Incremental validity of MMPI and MMPI-2 clinical scales in detecting malingering. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 12(2). 42–47.

17.

Reilly, Nora, et al.. (1994). Career commitment buffers the stress.. 4 indexed citations

18.

Brown, Larry K., et al.. (1991). Child and adolescent psychiatrists and HIV disease: A survey. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 30(5). 723–728. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact